I'll try. But what about VLAN 102 and 103 ?
I have also IRB on VLAN 102
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Chris Kawchuk
wrote:
> Try this
>
> set interfaces ge-2/1/2 flexible-vlan-tagging
> set interfaces ge-2/1/2 mtu 9192
> set interfaces ge-2/1/2 encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services
> set
Hi
Yes. It should be:
set bridge-domains VLAN101 domain-type bridge
set bridge-domains VLAN101 vlan-id 101
set bridge-domains VLAN102 domain-type bridge
set bridge-domains VLAN102 vlan-id 102
set bridge-domains VLAN103 domain-type bridge
set bridge-domains VLAN103 vlan-id 103
I made typo in first
Hello,
I've got a network with multiple customers vrf, defined mostly on EX4550.
I have to leak some route (from a 'admin/service' instance) on all
customers vrf. This work well with vrf-import/export.
I've rectenly notice that auto-export is not implemented in EX junos
code :( how I missed t
Hi @thiyagarajan,
I don't know.
I think all MX are 2GB RAM, there are not requisites.
Just download junos and install.
Only what you need to know is what features you want to use on the box.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2015-04-16 11:33 GMT-03:00 thiyagarajan b :
> @Eduardo. What will be the memory
@Eduardo. What will be the memory requirement for it? Is there any matrix
for Junos with Memory Prerequisites?
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Eduardo Schoedler
wrote:
> If you are thinking in run flows, I strongly recommend 13.3R6.
>
> With 12.3 I found too much bugs, including one wh
It works :)
Thanks!
Please, if you don't mind just helping me clear this confusion - why does
documentation says that filter using policer will by default share one
instance of that policer? When does this apply then?
Also will your physical-interface-filter share policer instance if applied
to di
If you are thinking in run flows, I strongly recommend 13.3R6.
With 12.3 I found too much bugs, including one who have killed my rpd and
take down all routing in the box.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em quinta-feira, 16 de abril de 2015, thiyagarajan b <
bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi All,
Close.
By declaring a vlan-Id in the BD definition -- the MX does vlan "normalisation"
as JNPR calls it. (And does all the correct push/pop magic for you)
If you omit the vlan-id statement in the BD definition, then your statement is
correct.
Quick verify: show interfaces ge-2/1/5 will show
Hi Rob, The router was hitting the PR# 820988. The router interfaces got
down and came back.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Robert Hass wrote:
> Can you write something details regarding this bug which you encountering
> on 11.4R ?
>
> Rob
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, thiyagarajan b
Can you write something details regarding this bug which you encountering
on 11.4R ?
Rob
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, thiyagarajan b
wrote:
> Hi Rapheal,
> 11.4 is what we are running now,where we encountered a bug forcing us to
> upgrade. 12.3R8 have few memory related bugs which seems t
Hi Chris,
> 2/1/5 is the "access port" which pops the outer tag on egress, slaps it on on
> ingress; regardless if it's already tagged coming in.
>
Wouldn't the frame still remain untagged within the BD please?
And would only get the tag 100 applied as a top tag when sent out of either
ge-2/1/2.1
Hi Rapheal,
11.4 is what we are running now,where we encountered a bug forcing us to
upgrade. 12.3R8 have few memory related bugs which seems to be resolved in
14.1R4.
Warm Regards.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>
>
> Le 16/04/15 10:58, thiyagarajan b a écrit :
>
>> T
Le 16/04/15 10:58, thiyagarajan b a écrit :
Thanks All for your suggestions,
Have taken 14.1R4 OS which has no bugs relating to our config. The memory
(2GB RAM and Flash) would suffice?
The best release will depends of our need.
Basicly if you do not want sampling you are safe running stable
Thanks All for your suggestions,
Have taken 14.1R4 OS which has no bugs relating to our config. The memory
(2GB RAM and Flash) would suffice?
warm regards.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2015-04-16 12:39 +0530), thiyagarajan b wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> > Request to suggest st
Can you provide a "show route hidden extensive" through pastebin.com or
something like that... Your pasting is not easily readable and that makes
it hard to help..
Cheers,
Masood
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Jonathan Call
wrote:
> I apologize. The email looked fine when I got it back from t
On (2015-04-16 12:39 +0530), thiyagarajan b wrote:
Hey,
> Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
>
> Running internet service and MPLS majorly.
I don't believe software is like wine, which gets better as it ages. It's also
incredibly specific if some given release is
11.4R12.4 seems pretty stable can also go 12.3R8.7 as well.
Tim Raphael
On 16/04/2015 3:09 pm, "thiyagarajan b" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
>
>Running internet service and MPLS majorly.
>
>Thanks.
>__
* thiyagarajan b
> Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
See http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
Tore
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/list
Hi All,
Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
Running internet service and MPLS majorly.
Thanks.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
19 matches
Mail list logo
