Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10G Switch Options

2015-06-05 Thread Mark Tinka
On 4/Jun/15 15:51, Raphael Mazelier wrote: EX4550 in the other hand are not perfect, but stable and less expensive. For aggregation swithes with only 10G ports I will go with EX4550. We love them. We aggregate customers on them (Layer 2 only), and can simply switch from 1Gbps to 10Gbps

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10G Switch Options

2015-06-05 Thread Amos Rosenboim
Hello, We use them as L2 core for a few small ISPs (port extension for MX80 routers). The buffers of the EX4550 are not very good. Especially when you go from 10g to 1g. Amos Sent from my iPhone On 5 Jun 2015, at 08:59, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mumailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On

Re: [j-nsp] SRX FBF issue

2015-06-05 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Fri 2015-Jun-05 19:11:16 +0300, Yuriy B. Borysov yokod...@yokodzun.kiev.ua wrote: Hello! I got a strange problem with Filter Based Forwarding on SRX 220. I have two uplink: show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0.14 description uplink1; vlan-id 14; family inet { mtu 1500; address

[j-nsp] SRX FBF issue

2015-06-05 Thread Yuriy B. Borysov
Hello! I got a strange problem with Filter Based Forwarding on SRX 220. I have two uplink: show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0.14 description uplink1; vlan-id 14; family inet { mtu 1500; address x.x.x.82/29; address x.x.x.85/29; address x.x.x.86/29; } show configuration