Re: [j-nsp] remove-private for iBGP session

Maybe I should have been more specific. This is on 12.3R3. But I guess this works differently on Cisco. I couldn't find anywhere in documentation that remove-private works for iBGP session. Yet I have this working in lab. Regards On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Cydon Satyr wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: [j-nsp] Cheaper way to have 2x100G and 16x10G wire-speed in MX480

You actually don’t need the newer backplane chassis for the SCBE2. On the original backplane chassis there is a slight reduction of available bandwidth compared to the newer one, but it is still much higher than SCBE and worth the upgrade to support newer modules even without a chassis swap. J

Re: [j-nsp] Cheaper way to have 2x100G and 16x10G wire-speed in MX480

Depending on your chassis you may be able to upgrade to SCBE2 - but that requires *all* MPC cards AND requires a newer style backplane (part number is escaping me at the moment) and of course with the MPC4 will require high capacity fans. Assuming you meet all of those hardware prereqs MPC4 based

[j-nsp] Cheaper way to have 2x100G and 16x10G wire-speed in MX480

Hi What is cheapest way to choose proper MPC/MICs to have 2x100G and 16x10G all wire-speed plus possibility to extend my configuration to total 32x10G and 4x100G ? Is it possible to have 200Gbps (400G in both directions) per slot in cast of malfunction of one fabric card ? What you can suggest ?

[j-nsp] remove-private for iBGP session

Hello, I was under the impression that remove-private works for eBGP sessions, as it does on Cisco routers (if my memory serves me right). But I notices that remove-private on a PE router would remove private AS (from customer's vrf bgp session) before sending it to a route reflector. Is this no