[j-nsp] LACP

2015-10-14 Thread David Samaniego
Hi all. I need to create an LACP between two ex3300-24t. This can be done if one of the links transport provider allows me only 802.1Q and the other only 802.1ad. It might be possible to configure the LACP? I appreciate any insight that can be provided. Thank you, David

Re: [j-nsp] LACP

2015-10-14 Thread Michael Loftis
You do not want to do LACP (or any ae) over dissimilar links. You will be on a trail of tears of poor performance and wonky behavior. LACP/ae is NOT designed for dissimilar links. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:15 AM, David Samaniego wrote: > Hi all. I need to create an LACP

Re: [j-nsp] LACP

2015-10-14 Thread joel jaeggli
On 10/14/15 2:54 PM, Michael Loftis wrote: > You do not want to do LACP (or any ae) over dissimilar links. You > will be on a trail of tears of poor performance and wonky behavior. > LACP/ae is NOT designed for dissimilar links. if they are nominally similar capacity l3 ecmp with and igp or bfd

[j-nsp] RE-S-2000-4096

2015-10-14 Thread Colton Conor
How many full routes can two RE-S-2000-4096 in a MX480 support? How limited is this older card? How does it compare to the RE found in the MX104 or built into the MX80? On the MX480, when do most make the decision to upgrade from the RE-S-2000-4096 to a RE-S-1800X4-16G? What does the extra