[j-nsp] EX4300 - Too many VLAN-IDs on interface

Hi, I just hit an issue where I tried to configure 2000 VLAN's on a LAG and got the error message "Too many VLAN-IDs on interface". If I remove the interface from the LAG I am able to configure all the VLAN's without issue. Based on the unit number that threw the error it seems like the number of

[j-nsp] authentication failure in case of configuration archival over scp

Hi, I have a Juniper router(Junos 10.4R12.4) which should archive its configuration over scp in case of commit: configuration { transfer-on-commit; archive-sites { "scp://juniper@backupserver:/home/juniper/configbackups" password "$9$2joDkf5F9tOik0IhcMWGDjq5Q"; ## SECRET-DATA

Re: [j-nsp] authentication failure in case of configuration archival over scp

> On Oct 21, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Martin T wrote: > > SSH server log tells that "error: PAM: Authentication failure for juniper > from r1". > What might cause this? Assuming the Junos version has not changed on the router, have there been any changes to the SSH server, or

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

> On Oct 21, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Chad Myers wrote: > > Please don't go the IOS/EOS/non-Junos method for rpd where each protocol is > completely independent and isolated from the others. It is extremely helpful > to be able to do things like put communities on static

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

> On Oct 21, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Tarko Tikan wrote: > > hey, > >> I always found using communities on non-BGP routes a little weird, >> but everyone has their favorite operational tricks. (And I try to >> seek out people to talk about them at conferences. It often leads to

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

On 21 October 2015 at 22:29, Jeff Haas wrote: > Hijacking the thread momentarily, what would you expect that to look like in > the config? community/tag keywording in a interface ... family foo {} scope? set interfaces xe-1/2/3 unit 42 family inet address 1.2.3.4/30 tag Z

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Jeff Haas wrote: > Adam, > >> On Oct 9, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Adam Chappell wrote: >>> >> I can imagine that making rpd MT is probably hard to the point of almost >> not being worth the benefit (with current REs), unless one

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

hey, I always found using communities on non-BGP routes a little weird, but everyone has their favorite operational tricks. (And I try to seek out people to talk about them at conferences. It often leads to small features.) Communities on static routes are great. But everyone wants more :)

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

On 21 October 2015 at 22:05, Chad Myers wrote: Hey Chad, > Please don't go the IOS/EOS/non-Junos method for rpd where each protocol is > completely independent and isolated from the others. It is extremely helpful > to be able to do things like put communities on

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

hey, set interfaces xe-1/2/3 unit 42 family inet address 1.2.3.4/30 tag Z set interfaces xe-1/2/3 unit 42 family inet address 1.2.3.4/30 community K Thats what I had in mind as well. -- tarko ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

On Oct 21, 2015, at 3:58 PM, Tarko Tikan wrote: > hey, > >> set interfaces xe-1/2/3 unit 42 family inet address 1.2.3.4/30 tag Z >> set interfaces xe-1/2/3 unit 42 family inet address 1.2.3.4/30 community K > > Thats what I had in mind as well. I'm for that method as well.

Re: [j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

On Oct 21, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > Hey Chad, > >> Please don't go the IOS/EOS/non-Junos method for rpd where each protocol is >> completely independent and isolated from the others. It is extremely >> helpful to be able to do things like put communities on static