Re: [j-nsp] EX4550: LACP channels short lost after commit

2015-11-01 Thread Olivier Benghozi
You can have mixed config for slow/fast (but you want to have slow on each side) since "the transmitter honors the receiver’s rate" (juniper doc). If the link stays up but is no longer contiguous (a 10G wave over older transmission equipments, an L2VPN link...), you'll have a longer delay to de

Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

2015-11-01 Thread Saku Ytti
On 1 November 2015 at 12:08, Jesper Skriver wrote: > To do what you suggest, one either has to replicate the MPLS > table, so that we can handle the same label values for each of the > suggested MPLS-IPv4, MPLS-IPv6, MPLS-XX, MPLS-YY, with the only > different being that they link to different L2

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550: LACP channels short lost after commit

2015-11-01 Thread Jeff Meyers
Hi Olivier, thanks for your reply. At least it is something, that can be solved then ;-) I have two follow-up questions: - can I change it to periodic slow without any impact (because the other side is still on slow) or will that have to happen simultaneously because expecting fast does also

Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

2015-11-01 Thread Jesper Skriver
Saku, On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47:48PM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 30 October 2015 at 12:35, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > > That would not be practical to implement for a router, implementations > > typically have the L2 header cached and the L3 forwarding > > constructs just point to a rewrite