[j-nsp] NETCONF in Junos

Hi, if I execute for example "show version brief | display xml" command, then the router returns: http://xml.juniper.net/junos/12.3R6/junos;> r1 m10i m10i junos JUNOS Base OS boot [12.3R6.6] /* additional data removed for

Re: [j-nsp] MTU on switch interfaces

Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > The MTU on EX4200 ports in port-mode access is 1514 bytes. Shouldn't > > it become 1518 bytes when the port is reconfigured in port-mode trunk ? > > You can set the interface MTU on the EX4200 to whatever you want; up to > 9,192 bytes. > Yes, I can, manually. But why

Re: [j-nsp] MTU on switch interfaces

On 19 December 2015 at 10:21, Tom Storey wrote: > Was always my understanding that JunOS MTU figures were on-the-wire > frame sizes, whereas Cisco was always payload sizes, with requisite > headers accounted for automagically. Preamble, SFD, DMAC, SMAC, EType, Payload, CRC, IFG

Re: [j-nsp] SRX performance

Like most manufacturers the performances quoted by Juniper are under ideal (or even better) conditions. The only way to be sure is to test with a representative load. In my case we were running backups (large packets one way, acks the other) over IPSec. We generally planned for 1/3 of the

Re: [j-nsp] NETCONF in Junos

Hey Martin, I’m not sure NETCONF is involved as such, but I think that’s the general idea. From a Juniper automation doc: > Junos management “under the hood” is based in XML. When you enter commands on > the Junos CLI, commands are actually converted to XML-based Remote Procedure > Calls

Re: [j-nsp] NETCONF in Junos

Hi ! Yes, if you want to see how the request command looks like Then do a " show version brief | display xml rpc" Using XSLT or SLAX the language create and uses exatly that XML information. Regards Alexander -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] SRX performance

Can anyone share real world SRX performance? ?I am looking at the SRX220 or SRX240 for a small website ~150-200Mbps in a co-location environment. The performance charts state the SRX220 can do 300Mbps with a mix of traffic and up to 900Mbps with mostly large packet sizes. thanks in advance,

Re: [j-nsp] SRX performance

Hi Mike, The SRX240H2 would handle that, assuming the packets-per-second were reasonably in line with the traffic rates. Remember there will be a performance impact depending on what features you enable. HTH. -- Stephen On 2015-12-20 9:16 AM, harbor235 wrote: Can anyone share real world