Phil Shafer writes:
>Phil Mayers writes:
>>What's the cause of the few/occasional commands where "| dis xml rpc"
>>doesn't work (e.g. "show virtual-chassis | display xml rpc")? I'm
>>assuming CLI must know how to format it as XML to send it to MGD.
>
>I'll take a look when I get back from break.
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/services-configuring-stateful-firewall-rules.html
For sync between the MS-MICs follow up directly with Juniper (there is a
solution but I have not tested it myself yet)
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Santiago Martinez
Hi, there is no Inter chassis ha for the MX series with MS-cards . Also the
number of supported IPSEC tunnel and tunnels per second is really low/bad. the
pps is not as bad as the session but is nothing similar to what huawe or
alcatel can do.
regards
santi
Sent from my iPhone
> On 27 Dec 20
Hi,
I am trying to use SRX240B as a VLAN capable switch and also VPLS
endpoint. VPLS works "well" for me with standard routed port, but when i
tried to use uplink port as a "switch port" and use RVI (routed vlan
interface) to connect to MPLS core, VPLS stop working: OSPF, BGP and
RSVP works well,
Hi
we currenmly have an NS5400 firewalls (two FW in active /passive mode); we
are thinking to replace it with MS-MIC/MPC on existing MX-960.
can you please tell me if we can have redudancy with MX in this case ?
for your information we have NAT and IP-Sec.
i'm asking because in NS5400 we have HA po
5 matches
Mail list logo