Colleagues,
We have Juniper switches interconnected by a transport network (NEC
equipment mostly). The nodes of the transport network are Ethernet
switches in their own right, they have 4 or 8 interface queues and can
do priority queueing and/or WRR queueing based on 802.1p codepoints in
received
Bogons still do a BGP feed with many deaggregated prefixes.
http://www.team-cymru.org/bogon-reference.html ( FULLBOGONS )
William Jackson
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Alexander Marhold
Sent: 16 February 2016 08:50
To:
Hi,
I would follow RFC 6890 when creating my bogon list. I would be a bit
nervous about taking a BGP feed of bogons from a 3rd party in case
they were compromised, and valid address space was introduced into, or
invalid address space was removed from their feed.
Regards,
Dave
On 16 February
On 16 February 2016 at 09:49, Alexander Marhold
wrote:
Hey,
> What do you recommend, and which way to get the lists and how often is an
> update needed
I recommend bogonising only statically bogons, which never change. No
unallocated bogonising (calling those bogons
Hello Steven,
Thank you for answering.
To begin with, we already replaced the MPC. The alarm still get raised at
random intervals. Besides the alarm, there's no preceding or trailing
errors. There's another MX960 configured exactly alike, dealing with the
2nd half of our end users, which never
Help.
I use in my network feed from team cymru. Rasy way to get bogom prefixes.
It is free so don't requier 100% uptime. ;-) Moste of the time BGP session
is establish.
W dniu wtorek, 16 lutego 2016 Alexander Marhold
napisał(a):
> Hi !
>
>
>
> My customer is a bigger
Hello Diogo,
Thank you for answering. Unfortunately, in my humble opinion, Juniper has
no clear procedure for us to follow.
The cumulative effect of all the test we ran and those you and others
courteously pointed out, is basically none. This in my opinion, due the the
very fact that Juniper has
7 matches
Mail list logo