Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

2016-05-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On 5/May/16 03:08, Colton Conor wrote: > Mark, > > Which problems does the ACX5048 have today? I realize there are > multiple models, but I specifically am talking about the ACX5048. The ACX5000 comes in two models - the 48-port and 96-port. We dropped the ACX5000 because of lack of NG-MVPN

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

2016-05-04 Thread Colton Conor
Mark, Which problems does the ACX5048 have today? I realize there are multiple models, but I specifically am talking about the ACX5048. Also, Comcast is deploying the ACX2200 for their 2Gbps fiber to the home/business product. I assume that means they are low cost devices. So ASR920 vs Juniper

Re: [j-nsp] Routing specific traffic on LSPs

2016-05-04 Thread Khairul Alam
Hi, We have been doing the same thing with our customer circuits, l2circuits to be specific, by writing a policy and exporting it to the forwarding table. An example is below set routing-options forwarding-table export l2circuit-no-LDP set policy-options policy-statement l2circuit-no-LDP term 1

Re: [j-nsp] [SPF:Passed] Re: EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

2016-05-04 Thread raf
Thanks aaron for the reply. Vpls don't work on EX4550, the stanza does not even exist. I'm interested in the result of your test on acx. Stanzas exists good starting point. Do you test further ? Regards, Le 03/05/2016 à 22:00, Aaron a écrit : Raphael , I had issues last year when trying to

Re: [j-nsp] Routing specific traffic on LSPs

2016-05-04 Thread Saku Ytti
On 3 May 2016 at 17:37, Anand Anand wrote: > I want to route some of the (critical) cell sites of the 3G service over the > radio upon the fiber failure. All the 3G cell site traffic are configured > with the similar QoS markings. Prioritizing one Site over the other

Re: [j-nsp] Routing specific traffic on LSPs

2016-05-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On 4/May/16 02:28, Anand Anand wrote: > Hi, > > I have a requirement where i am going to have a p2p radio link as a backup > path to a primary fiber link. > > The fiber carries a lot of vpn services. During the fiber failure, i want > to route only crititical vpn services thru the radio link

Re: [j-nsp] Routing specific traffic on LSPs

2016-05-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On 4/May/16 07:48, Anand Anand wrote: > How about mapping the destination addresses to the LSP? will it help? That is the forwarding part. The question is how to identify what traffic to forward... Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Routing specific traffic on LSPs

2016-05-04 Thread Shiva S Narayana via juniper-nsp
I had some similar to this. Can you build a RSVP tunnel per-VRF through the radio signal path. I'm not sure how mapping the destination to LSPs will work as in a l3VPN traffic is destined for BGP protocol next-hop.  On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 8:07 AM, Anand Anand

Re: [j-nsp] Routing specific traffic on LSPs

2016-05-04 Thread Anand Anand
How about mapping the destination addresses to the LSP? will it help? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 4/May/16 02:28, Anand Anand wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a requirement where i am going to have a p2p radio link as a > backup > > path to a