Think this think is not available yet for acx5048
Only september ... I will check for you
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 12, 2016, at 18:22, Aaron wrote:
>
> Anyone ever try to virtual chassis (2) ACX5048's together into one ?
>
>
>
> -Aaron
>
>
Anyone ever try to virtual chassis (2) ACX5048's together into one ?
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Packet mode is working in srx1500 ?
This box is pretty new, and on the paper look a very versatile toolbox.
--
Raphael Mazelier
Le 12/05/2016 à 16:46, Giuliano Medalha a écrit :
It is an excelent option
We are testing it like metro router righ now
It has a lot of good mpls/vpls
It is an excelent option
We are testing it like metro router righ now
It has a lot of good mpls/vpls implementation ( packet mode ) and works fine
Good interfaces layout
But the problem is related to the business unit ... Of this box
The main function is ng firewall and not metro router
When
What about the new SRX1500, x86 platform, 2m routes:
https://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000551-en.pdf
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
>> From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016
> From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:30 PM
> To: Adam Vitkovsky
> Cc: Satish Patel; Aaron; jnsp list; Vincent Bernat
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model
>
> I don't think that is correct Adam. The ASR903 does not hold full routes, and
> the MX104
Adam,
I think because of the price point of the ASR903 just is not there. These
Juniper ACX5048's can be bought for under $5,000 new. The ASR903 with a
hefty discount was in the $15k range with like one line card. Even if you
fully populated the 903 it wouldn't have the same amount of ports as a
Wondering why no one mentioned ASR903 with RSP3.
It can do 100GE per slot (8x10Ge/2x40GE/1x100GE) and there are 6 slots.
Two RSPs two PSUs (only FAN tray is single point of failure).
And feature wise it should do everything that ASR920 does.
Compared to Juniper the only drawback is the FIB scale
Yes these are syslog traps as they arrive at my syslog server... they are
sent from the MX104 running cgnat.
This is good info that I cannot change that embedded utc time stamp on the
cgnat syslog trap.
Thanks Alex
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing
Hi Colton,
Q1 - Have you tested any of the OAM features on the ACX5048 like Y.1564,
802.3ah, 802.1ag, Y.1731, Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) and
RFC2544?
A1 – no, but we do have a CFM effort underway for getting to know CFM better
and understand how to architect
Hello,
These are taken from MX104 Routing Engine logs, correct?
If yes then "2016-05-11 16:19:58" is added by syslogd on RE.
And "2016-05-11 21:19:57" is WELF timestamp in syslog message from MS-MIC.
MS-MIC always keeps UTC timezone and this cannot be changed.
HTH
Thx
Alex
On 11/05/2016 23:08,
11 matches
Mail list logo