On 20/Jun/16 19:12, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I'm not pointing at JNPR, other vendors do it too. But these
> cheap/dense boxes have tons of things that don't work, and can't work
> and there isn't any clean nice page which lists all gotchas. I think
> it's marketing, marketing fears that if all non-wor
> On 21/06/2016, at 05:05, Mohammad Salbad wrote:
>
> Try to set statistics under the sub interfaces
I presume this was in response to my message. Thanks for that - we found the
same thing subsequently. Waiting for feedback on why this is required - perhaps
there is a resource constraint on t
Hum ... I think in ACX you will need to explicit use statistics command ...
set interfaces xe-0/0/1 statistics
Giuliano Cardozo Medalha
Systems Engineer
+55 (17) 3011-3811
+55 (17) 98112-5394
JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE
giuli...@wztech.com.br
http://www.wztech.com.br/
WZTECH is registered tra
Yeah, strange my subinterface doesn't show any packets out, but the phy int
shows currently 17 mbps going out right now...
Maybe these counters are broken on the subint... I tried walking with snmp but
I still didn't see any traffic for the subinterface used on the l2circuit
agould@blcn-h-5048>
Just fyi about protecting I've got v4 and v6 mpls l3vpn (6vpe) dual stacked
on my acx5048 and I've accomplished protecting control plane from external ssh
for public ipv4 and ipv6 addresses and also from local customers hitting
fe80::/10 link local on subscriber facing irb
Seems to be worki
On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> If JNPR would list them, people might unfairly assume vendor who does
> not, is superior.
>
> We really should have community pages documenting devices and their
> limitations. Like dpreview for networking kit :/
I would love such a thing. I ju
Please not response, Publishing again?
2016-06-16 16:18 GMT-03:00 Gabriel Farias :
> Message: health-monitor as the cause?
>
> Hello members,
>
>
> There are many options to monitor the health of Juniper equipment with
> Junos, the record of events usually are via snmp and logging equipment, the
Hi Saku, I agree having a small db with features limitations and scalability
will be great and saves us lot of headache.
regards
santi
> On 20 Jun 2016, at 10:12, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> I'm not pointing at JNPR, other vendors do it too. But these
> cheap/dense boxes have tons of things that don'
I'm not pointing at JNPR, other vendors do it too. But these
cheap/dense boxes have tons of things that don't work, and can't work
and there isn't any clean nice page which lists all gotchas. I think
it's marketing, marketing fears that if all non-working stuff is
listed, people won't buy the kit,
Try to set statistics under the sub interfaces
Regards
M. Salbad
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Le 20/06/2016 à 06:03, Nathan Ward a écrit :
Hi all,
I’m deploying some ACX5048 boxes, doing l2circuits from subinterfaces off to
BNGs and so on.
We’re wanting to get counters for each l2circuit, or each subinterface, but as
soon as a an l2circuit is attached to a subint, we lose all counters
Hi all,
I’m deploying some ACX5048 boxes, doing l2circuits from subinterfaces off to
BNGs and so on.
We’re wanting to get counters for each l2circuit, or each subinterface, but as
soon as a an l2circuit is attached to a subint, we lose all counters.
We can achieve what we want, more or less, b
12 matches
Mail list logo