Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Colton Conor
Aaron, About 28k including hardware, license, and 12 months of support. Not bad for as many ports as it has, and full BGP. On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Jesper Skriver wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:45:14PM -0600, Aaron wrote: > > Ah, thanks Jesper... you know how

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:45:14PM -0600, Aaron wrote: > Ah, thanks Jesper... you know how much those 7280's cost ? (just ballpark) No idea, sorry. /Jesper ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Aaron
Ok thanks, I’m learning a lot today J From: Tim Jackson [mailto:jackson@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:52 PM To: Aaron Cc: Jesper Skriver ; Jared Mauch ; jnsp ; Tim Durack

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Michael Still
I agree that the PTX1K is too expensive as well. The QFX10K is a viable alternative. It's basically the same hardware just different (less) RAM and no MEF certification (PTX1K is certified). PTX1K has higher scale MPLS like number of LSPs and what not. Ask your SE to do a side by side on them to

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Tim Jackson
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos16.1/topics/concept/mpls-features-qfx-series-overview.html#mpls-features-by-release On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Aaron wrote: > Thanks Tim(s), I understand the QFX1 isn’t mpls capable. > > > > Also, I’m thinking the cisco

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Aaron
Thanks Tim(s), I understand the QFX1 isn’t mpls capable. Also, I’m thinking the cisco ncs5501 might work for me at (6) 100’s. also, wow, ncs5502 has (48) 100 gig. -Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Aaron
Ah, thanks Jesper... you know how much those 7280's cost ? (just ballpark) - Aaron -Original Message- From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jes...@skriver.dk] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:30 PM To: Aaron Cc: 'Jared Mauch' ; 'Tim Jackson'

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Tim Jackson
Arista does not have RSVP-TE, nor fully featured BGP-LU.. FlexRoute for full fib usage seems a little like black magic & hand waving though: https://www.arista.com/assets/data/pdf/Whitepapers/FlexRoute-WP.pdf The other cheaper option to the PTX1000 is QFX1 when you don't need a full FIB.

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:21:22PM -0600, Aaron wrote: > I was thinking about the ptx1000 as a supercore fast mpls swapping p-box. I > understand it can have (24) 100 gig ! > > I've seen the PTX1000 referred to as a supercore router , and I understand it > has MPLS LSR functions (someone told

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Tim Durack
NCS-5501 non-SE version is 48x 10G + 6x 100G NCS-5502 is 48x 100G On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:21 PM Aaron wrote: > I was thinking about the ptx1000 as a supercore fast mpls swapping p-box. > I understand it can have (24) 100 gig ! > > I've seen the PTX1000 referred to as a

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Aaron
I was thinking about the ptx1000 as a supercore fast mpls swapping p-box. I understand it can have (24) 100 gig ! I've seen the PTX1000 referred to as a supercore router , and I understand it has MPLS LSR functions (someone told me that it does not do mpls edge (pe) functions) ...i see/hear

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Aaron
How much ? - Aaron From: Tim Jackson [mailto:jackson@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 1:09 PM To: Aaron Cc: jnsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000 It costs wy too much is what I think about it.. -- Tim

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Jared Mauch
There’s 3 main boxes in this space, the Cisco NCS550x, PTX1K and the Arista 7280 all with varying positives/negatives based on your use case. I’m not aware of many other full fib scale devices in this profile, if I’m missing some I’d like to know :-) - Jared > On Dec 16, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Tim

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Tim Jackson
It costs wy too much is what I think about it.. -- Tim On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Aaron wrote: > Anyone using the PTX1000 ? If so, let me know what you think about it. > > > > - Aaron > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing

[j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000

2016-12-16 Thread Aaron
Anyone using the PTX1000 ? If so, let me know what you think about it. - Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS bug for QinQ VLANs

2016-12-16 Thread Chuck Anderson
I recommend 12.3R12-S3.1 for EX2200/3200/4200/4500. I has many bug fixes over 12.3R12.4: https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=TSB16975=SUBSCRIPTION However I see that JTAC is now recommending 15.1R5: https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=KB21476=search I haven't

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS bug for QinQ VLANs

2016-12-16 Thread Dovid Bender
The Juniper site was a bit confusing and I thought the latest was 12.3R as well till I was told otherwise on IRC (that US Domestic is being done away with). On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Laurent CARON wrote: > On 15/12/2016 16:15, Valentini, Lucio wrote: > >> it

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS bug for QinQ VLANs

2016-12-16 Thread Laurent CARON
On 15/12/2016 16:15, Valentini, Lucio wrote: it seems there is a bug in the latest version of JUNOS for the EX4200: JUNOS Base OS boot [12.3R12.4] Hi, Latest release is: JUNOS EX Software Suite [15.1R5.5] ___ juniper-nsp mailing list