Aaron,
About 28k including hardware, license, and 12 months of support. Not bad
for as many ports as it has, and full BGP.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:45:14PM -0600, Aaron wrote:
> > Ah, thanks Jesper... you know how much those 7280's cost
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:45:14PM -0600, Aaron wrote:
> Ah, thanks Jesper... you know how much those 7280's cost ? (just ballpark)
No idea, sorry.
/Jesper
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
Ok thanks, I’m learning a lot today J
From: Tim Jackson [mailto:jackson@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:52 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: Jesper Skriver ; Jared Mauch ;
jnsp ; Tim Durack
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos16.1/topics
I agree that the PTX1K is too expensive as well. The QFX10K is a viable
alternative. It's basically the same hardware just different (less) RAM and
no MEF certification (PTX1K is certified). PTX1K has higher scale MPLS like
number of LSPs and what not. Ask your SE to do a side by side on them to
se
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos16.1/topics/concept/mpls-features-qfx-series-overview.html#mpls-features-by-release
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Aaron wrote:
> Thanks Tim(s), I understand the QFX1 isn’t mpls capable.
>
>
>
> Also, I’m thinking the cisco ncs5501 might wor
Thanks Tim(s), I understand the QFX1 isn’t mpls capable.
Also, I’m thinking the cisco ncs5501 might work for me at (6) 100’s. also,
wow, ncs5502 has (48) 100 gig.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://
Ah, thanks Jesper... you know how much those 7280's cost ? (just ballpark)
- Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jes...@skriver.dk]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:30 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: 'Jared Mauch' ; 'Tim Jackson'
; 'jnsp'
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000
On Fr
Arista does not have RSVP-TE, nor fully featured BGP-LU..
FlexRoute for full fib usage seems a little like black magic & hand waving
though:
https://www.arista.com/assets/data/pdf/Whitepapers/FlexRoute-WP.pdf
The other cheaper option to the PTX1000 is QFX1 when you don't need a
full FIB.
--
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:21:22PM -0600, Aaron wrote:
> I was thinking about the ptx1000 as a supercore fast mpls swapping p-box. I
> understand it can have (24) 100 gig !
>
> I've seen the PTX1000 referred to as a supercore router , and I understand it
> has MPLS LSR functions (someone told m
NCS-5501 non-SE version is 48x 10G + 6x 100G
NCS-5502 is 48x 100G
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:21 PM Aaron wrote:
> I was thinking about the ptx1000 as a supercore fast mpls swapping p-box.
> I understand it can have (24) 100 gig !
>
> I've seen the PTX1000 referred to as a supercore router , and
I was thinking about the ptx1000 as a supercore fast mpls swapping p-box. I
understand it can have (24) 100 gig !
I've seen the PTX1000 referred to as a supercore router , and I understand it
has MPLS LSR functions (someone told me that it does not do mpls edge (pe)
functions)
...i see/hear n
How much ?
- Aaron
From: Tim Jackson [mailto:jackson@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 1:09 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: jnsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper PTX1000
It costs wy too much is what I think about it..
--
Tim
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Aaron ma
There’s 3 main boxes in this space, the Cisco NCS550x, PTX1K and the Arista
7280 all with varying positives/negatives based on your use case.
I’m not aware of many other full fib scale devices in this profile, if I’m
missing some I’d like to know :-)
- Jared
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Tim
It costs wy too much is what I think about it..
--
Tim
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Aaron wrote:
> Anyone using the PTX1000 ? If so, let me know what you think about it.
>
>
>
> - Aaron
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@pu
Anyone using the PTX1000 ? If so, let me know what you think about it.
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
I recommend 12.3R12-S3.1 for EX2200/3200/4200/4500. I has many bug
fixes over 12.3R12.4:
https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=TSB16975&actp=SUBSCRIPTION
However I see that JTAC is now recommending 15.1R5:
https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476&actp=se
The Juniper site was a bit confusing and I thought the latest was 12.3R as
well till I was told otherwise on IRC (that US Domestic is being done away
with).
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Laurent CARON
wrote:
> On 15/12/2016 16:15, Valentini, Lucio wrote:
>
>> it seems there is a bug in the
On 15/12/2016 16:15, Valentini, Lucio wrote:
it seems there is a bug in the latest version of JUNOS for the EX4200:
JUNOS Base OS boot [12.3R12.4]
Hi,
Latest release is:
JUNOS EX Software Suite [15.1R5.5]
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@p
18 matches
Mail list logo