Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 flow routes

2017-04-07 Thread Olivier Benghozi
As read on https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/example/example-configuring-bgp-to-carry-ipv6-flow-routes.html : set routing-options rib inet6.0 flow route

[j-nsp] IPv6 flow routes

2017-04-07 Thread Brad Fleming
Does Junos support creation of IPv6 flow routes? This taken from an MX10 in our lab running 16.1R1.7: root@lab# show routing-options flow route junk { then discard; match destination 2001:49d0::1/128; } [edit] root@lab# commit check [edit routing-options flow route junk] 'match'

Re: [j-nsp] flowspec in logical-systems

2017-04-07 Thread Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
Hi, We use it to seperate production environnements between our different entities. I know that we have run into some odd limitations when using L-SYS. If it's only for testing purposes, I guess that spinning a VM with vSRX / vMX does the trick. HTH. Y. > Le 7 avr. 2017 à 20:43, Aaron

Re: [j-nsp] flowspec in logical-systems

2017-04-07 Thread Aaron Gould
Do you all use logical-systems in your operational network? How pleased are you with them? I have an MX104 with about 8 lsys's and I am using it for a study lab and love it. I envision being able to cleanly separate router functions in my network for P or PE type things... and uplink PE to P

Re: [j-nsp] ACX control plane filter

2017-04-07 Thread Aaron Gould
https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=KB28893=RSS https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2016-April/032346.html - Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Match multiple bgp communities in a policy with AND condition

2017-04-07 Thread Job Snijders
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:38:20AM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 6 April 2017 at 19:17, Michael Still wrote: > > FYI I made a Juniper SE submit an ER to implement this kind of > > functionality (plus some more community stuff). What I asked for > > related to this case was to

Re: [j-nsp] Match multiple bgp communities in a policy with AND condition

2017-04-07 Thread Saku Ytti
On 6 April 2017 at 19:17, Michael Still wrote: Hey, > FYI I made a Juniper SE submit an ER to implement this kind of > functionality (plus some more community stuff). What I asked for > related to this case was to be able to add this `logical-operation > or|and|xor|not` to