Probably the knob from the link below configured towards the r1 will
prevent sending the default
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/
topics/example/vpn-proxy-bgp-route-target-filtering-configuring.html
Ivan,
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Mihai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why would a rou
Hi,
Why would a router advertise the default RT on behalf of other router in
a full mesh IBGP? (The RR case is very clear)
Regards,
Mihai
On 06/06/2017 09:42 PM, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
Check this link -
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vpn-proxy-bgp-route-tar
Hi,
Check this link -
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vpn-proxy-bgp-route-target-filtering-understanding.html
If you configure the rest of the routers with family route-target r3 and r4
will stop sending the proxy route you see. Or just use RR.
Ivan,
On Tue, Jun
Update: using route policies with rtf-prefix-list works, but
rtf-prefix-lists are supported from Junos 12.2 and I have devices with
older software.
I am more interested if this is a 'normal' behavior.
Regards,
Mihai
On 06/06/2017 07:41 PM, Mihai wrote:
Hi,
I have three routers (r1,r3,r4) an
Is this a command ? "r3# run show table bgp.rt"
Please send ...
"show configuration routing-instance | display set"
Or
"show routing-instance | display set"
I'm not sure route-reflectors have anything to do with the fact that you are
learning 0/0 route.
- Aaron
_
Hi,
I have three routers (r1,r3,r4) and a full mesh IBGP between them.
R1 is configured with inet-vpn , R3 and R4 with inet-vpn and route-target.
r1# show protocols bgp
group IBGP {
type internal;
local-address 1.1.1.1;
family inet-vpn {
unicast;
}
neighbor 3.3.3.3;
Dear experts,
Has anybody already approached the PTP monitoring requested by MIDIF 2 ?
---
Article 4 of RTS 25 states :
Compliance with the maximum divergence requirements
Operators of trading venues and their members or participants shall
establish a system of traceability t
7 matches
Mail list logo
