❦ 22 juin 2017 00:28 +0200, Thomas Bellman :
> We have a QFX5100 on which we have enabled cut-throug forwarding
> ('set forwarding-options cut-through'). Now I am curious about
> how effective that is. Is there any statistics one can dig out
> about how often the switch is
On 22/06/2017 11:27 PM, Nelson, Brian wrote:
Model: qfx5100-96s-8q
Junos: 14.1X53-D42.3
user@qfx5100-96s# set forwarding-options cut-through ?
Possible completions:
<[Enter]>Execute this command
accounting Configure accounting of traffic
analyzer Analyzer
Hi,
In this particular case, the sources are not located in the same location
hence their IP address is not adjacent to each other hence summarization is
not an option unfortunately.
I am a bit surprised if Juniper has not worked on this very limited
capacity yet even after quite some time,
Model: qfx5100-96s-8q
Junos: 14.1X53-D42.3
user@qfx5100-96s# set forwarding-options cut-through ?
Possible completions:
<[Enter]>Execute this command
> accounting Configure accounting of traffic
> analyzer Analyzer options
+ apply-groups Groups from
It is readily available in 17.2; not sure about earlier versions.
branto@host# set forwarding-options ?
Possible completions:
> access-security Access security configuration
> accounting Configure accounting of traffic
> analyzer Analyzer options
+ apply-groups
Oh my gosh, guess what….Syslog traps were arriving at the server all along….but
were going into /var/log/daemon.log …and I was grepping on /var/log/syslog
:|
Thanks for all your suggestions…
At this point using just 2 statements for “set system syslog host ….
source-address …”… I
Sorry I don't have an answer... but interestingly, I see this as a hidden
command on the cousin ACX5048... is it hidden in the QFX5100 or in plain view
using the ? after set forwarding-option ?
I haven't used it nor committed it further so I don't know of its functionality
on this ACX5048
Hi Alex,
yes, 2.2.2.2 is resolvable on the core router.
Your hint with advertising the connected routes to the injection router, works
like a charm and is a suitable solution for us. Thank you :)
Best regards
Alex
Von: "Alexander Arseniev"
An: "Alexander Dube"
Hello,
Is 2.2.2.2 resolvable on a core router then?
Via in interface/connected subnet perhaps?
If yes then announce all conected subnets from core router(s) via iBGP
to Your VMX.
Then configure Your statics on VMX with "resolve" knob, and announce
them via iBGP back to core router(s). Your
Hello,
we try to implement a route injection with a vmx to reduce the count of static
routes on our core routers ( a very large amount ... )
I've the problem, that if i set a static route on the vmx, it will be
advertised with the wrong next-hop ( self in this case )
The session between the
10 matches
Mail list logo