Re: [j-nsp] traceroute in mpls vpn's not showing P hops

Given that LSP's are by there very nature unidirectional you will need a return LSP unless you plan export your VRF routes into your underlying network. The path that that return LSP takes should not make a difference unless you are testing specific return path(s), so it should not interfere

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

Thanks for the help! On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Pavel Lunin wrote: > Yes, EX4500/4550 chipset is not able to treat any additional tags of the > MPLS packet. > > IIRC, they "officially support" (whatever it means) pseudowires and VPLS in > EX4550 to EX4550 mode only thus

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

Yes, EX4500/4550 chipset is not able to treat any additional tags of the MPLS packet. IIRC, they "officially support" (whatever it means) pseudowires and VPLS in EX4550 to EX4550 mode only thus it's nowhere documented that it pops the vlan tag by default and can't treat the control world. 23

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

Setting the control word worked right away. Is the issue lack of support of the control word on one of the sides? On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Pavel Lunin wrote: > > > Try to add no-control-world under your l2circuit/neighbor/interface config > on both sides (as well the

Re: [j-nsp] traceroute in mpls vpn's not showing P hops

Thanks, opps, I forgot to tell y'all I tried "set protocols mpls icmp-tunneling" already and it didn't work. Also, I need to mention that the vrf between the (2) CE's is built on top of a unidirectional rsvp lsp I'm testing rsvp te to learn about it and I only built the lsp in one direction

Re: [j-nsp] mx480, netflow/version9 ipv6 help

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, John Brown wrote: yes, sorry I forgot to include that fpc 1 { sampling-instance 1to1; Be very careful with 1:1 sampling if that's what you are in fact doing. In most of the cases that come to mind, 1:1 sampling isn't necessary to get the data you need for things like

Re: [j-nsp] mx480, netflow/version9 ipv6 help

Not sure my flow collector (a ELK based config) will properly handle IP-FIX On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:48 AM, wrote: >> Hi, I'm trying to add IPv6 to my flow picture and I'm getting an >> error from Junos. >> Any help is much appreciated. THANK YOU > > We are exporting IPv6

Re: [j-nsp] mx480, netflow/version9 ipv6 help

yes, sorry I forgot to include that fpc 1 { sampling-instance 1to1; inline-services { flow-table-size { ipv4-flow-table-size 5; ipv6-flow-table-size 5; } } } fpc 2 { sampling-instance 1to1; inline-services {

Re: [j-nsp] mx480, netflow/version9 ipv6 help

> Hi, I'm trying to add IPv6 to my flow picture and I'm getting an > error from Junos. > Any help is much appreciated. THANK YOU We are exporting IPv6 netflow info using IPfix - haven't tried v9. Seems to work for us. In your config, try replacing all "version9" occurrences with

Re: [j-nsp] mx480, netflow/version9 ipv6 help

Hi John, Do you have the following configured on the fpc you have installed? *ATTENTION! THIS WILL AUTOMATICALLY REBOOT THE FPC !!!* https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.3/topics/reference/configuration-statement/ipv6-flow-table-size.html *Note: *Any change in the configured size

[j-nsp] mx480, netflow/version9 ipv6 help

Hi, I'm trying to add IPv6 to my flow picture and I'm getting an error from Junos. Any help is much appreciated. THANK YOU Junos: 14.2R1.9 Error from commit check sampling inline configuration error Can't configure inline output with V5, V8 and V9 collector configured for family inet6

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

Try to add no-control-world under your l2circuit/neighbor/interface config on both sides (as well the VLAN push/pop on the ACX side). 2017-08-23 15:16 GMT+02:00 Jay Hanke : > No luck. Here is the config I tried > > unit 517 { > encapsulation vlan-ccc; > vlan-id 517; >

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

No luck. Here is the config I tried unit 517 { encapsulation vlan-ccc; vlan-id 517; input-vlan-map pop; output-vlan-map push; } On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Enoch Nyatoti wrote: > Hi, > > Can you try the following on your ACX5048 interface: > > set

[j-nsp] 10Gbps xe interface to 20Gbps ae interface

Hi all, I'm wondering if anybody had any issues on an MX480 (13.3R9) moving a single xe interface to an aggregated ethernet bundle of 2 xe interfaces. These interfaces go to an EX virtual chassis. I already made the ae interface on the switch side and assigned all the relevant VLANs.

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

Hi, Can you try the following on your ACX5048 interface: set interfaces xe-0/0/46.517input-vlan-map popset interfaces xe-0/0/46.517output-vlan-map push  Best regards Enoch Nyatoti On Wednesday, August 23, 2017, 7:51:21 AM GMT+1, Jay Hanke wrote: I'm having an issue

[j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

I'm having an issue where I'm unable to pass traffic through a vlan-ccc between an ACX5048 and an EX4500. Other circuits on same boxes are working fine. The other circuits are ACX to ACX and EX to EX. PE1 (ex4500) l2circuit { neighbor 10.200.xx.xy { interface xe-0/0/1.517 {