Re: [j-nsp] Improving EBGP defaults: sideloading RFC 8212 on Junos

Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 09:07:54AM +0100, adamv0...@netconsultings.com: > Or you can start using routers with proper BGP implementation to connect to > the internet (IOS-XR based), where this has been the default since ever. that is bunk. IOS has had plenty of irrational defaults.

Re: [j-nsp] logical system in production - MX960

Well, I have heard that the external server is for scaling node slicing beyond what the stand-alone node slicing in-chassis can do. Would someone have a link or instructions on how to do node slicing *without* the external x86 server ? -Aaron ___

Re: [j-nsp] logical system in production - MX960

Strongly agree with Ytti. Most LSYS deployments I've seen were really "deploy an LSYS to deploy an LSYS" kind of of thing. Some more or less viable use-case I know is BGP scaling: dedicated rpd in an LSYS for an off-path RR. It creates a dedicated 32-bit rpd, which can consume another 4GB of RAM.

Re: [j-nsp] logical system in production - MX960

Thanks, and I'm learning that node slicing requires at least an MX480...also supported on MX960, MX2010, MX2020node slicing is very different than lsys in that it runs a few of its components on external x86 servers... external meaning separate from the bsys (bsys is the MX hardware

Re: [j-nsp] logical system in production - MX960

On 25 September 2017 at 15:10, Aaron Gould wrote: Hey, > Do you all use logical systems in your production environment ? No. Be sure you're solving real technical problems, not political or process. I know there are use-cases, but I suspect there are fewer use-cases than

Re: [j-nsp] logical system in production - MX960

> Of Aaron Gould > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 1:11 PM > > Do you all use logical systems in your production environment ? > No I'm not suicidal, but then again if you test all aspects and it works for your setup what is there to object to right? Good luck. adam

Re: [j-nsp] Improving EBGP defaults: sideloading RFC 8212 on Junos

> Job Snijders > Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2017 5:18 PM > > Dear all, > > Currently, out of the box, a device running Junos will accept any routes and > announce any routes on EBGP session when no import or export policy is > defined for that neighbor. This oftentimes is not the appropriate