[j-nsp] BGP question (Default action if no protocol specified)

2017-11-07 Thread craig washington
All, I was working a lab and noticed that if I didn't specify a protocol on an IBGP redistribution it basically sends everything you have? Direct, local, Agg or whatever. I am assuming this is working as designed b/c once I specified a protocol all of the routes disappeared. For example I

Re: [j-nsp] Simple v4 vs v6 traffic measurement

2017-11-07 Thread Tim St. Pierre
It won't work on the M10i, but when I get the MX104 turned up, I'm going to try this! Just to follow up, I did manage to get Cacti graphing the firewall counters, so I now have nice graphs, and can see that we are about 25% IPv6 now. Thanks everyone! On 2017-10-31 05:21 PM, Daniel

Re: [j-nsp] Need Assistance

2017-11-07 Thread Brian Johnson
Completely agree. Unless you want all BGP routes to have a better preference than all OSPF routes. The route policy is a scalpel, the protocol preference is a hammer. - Brian > On Nov 7, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Julian Seifert wrote: > > Hi, > > wouldn't it be more preferable(less

Re: [j-nsp] Need Assistance

2017-11-07 Thread Julian Seifert
Hi, wouldn't it be more preferable(less general impact than completely changing protocol preferene value) to set the routepreference for this specific route to <10 in the BGP import policy? set policy-options policy-statement BGP-IMPORT term set-Pref from route-filter 172.16.0.0/16 exact