Re: [j-nsp] Standard practice for customer eBGP peering traffic engineer

On Mon 2017-Nov-13 15:27:36 +, Nick Cutting wrote: What is the benefit for a customer or a provider in doing this v.s just the customer prepending their own AS? Prepending done customer side would be visible to anyone beyond that first BGP peering between the

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

Hi, Am 14.11.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Sebastian Becker: The enhanced midplane allows you already to use higher bandwidth with redundancy at least on the MX960. 205G per slot (not > enhanced) against 240G per slot (enhanced) So if you want to use a MPC5E-100G10G and populate every port (2x100G

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:55:03PM +0100, Pavel Lunin wrote: > > Is there anyone who can give more details about the enhanced midplane? > > It's just more lines (wires) to provide more fabric bandwidth per-slot/PFE. > And maybe more power as well, I am not sure though. No, it's just better

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

Is there anyone who can give more details about the enhanced midplane? > It's just more lines (wires) to provide more fabric bandwidth per-slot/PFE. And maybe more power as well, I am not sure though. It's been shipping for ages (since 2012 or something like). It had been supposed to be required

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

The enhanced midplane allows you already to use higher bandwidth with redundancy at least on the MX960. 205G per slot (not enhanced) against 240G per slot (enhanced) So if you want to use a MPC5E-100G10G and populate every port (2x100G plus 4x10G) you need the enhanced midplane and the SCBE2.

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

While I don't care about SONET/SDH in 2017 (sorry...), the enhanced midplane (in the MX240/480/960 MX generation) also (mainly?) allows more bandwidth per slot with the future SCBE3. You may find a fugitive Juniper 2016 PDF on your preferred search engine ("SCBE3" "premium3" "mx"). > On 14

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

On 14 Nov 2017, at 11:56 EAT, Karl Gerhard wrote: As far as I understand the cross-coupling of clock input is only related to SONET/SDH stuff, is that correct? Not just SDH. SyncE allows you to do frequency synchronisation of clocks over Ethernet transport.

Re: [j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

> On 14/11/2017, at 9:56 PM, Karl Gerhard wrote: > > As far as I understand the cross-coupling of clock input is only related to > SONET/SDH stuff, is that correct? Probably 1588 and stuff as well. Useful if you’re a mobile operator or someone else that cares about

[j-nsp] Enhanced MX480 Midplane?

Hello this article is mentioning an enhanced MX480 midplane. This is the first time I hear of that: CHAS-BP-MX480-S (=Non-Enhanced) vs. CHAS-BP3-MX480-S (=Enhanced) https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/scbe2-mx480-desc.html Is there anyone who can