On 25/Jan/18 20:42, Giuliano C. Medalha wrote:
> We are testing the MX10003 right now.
We're looking at the MX10003 to support customers in the edge who want
to connect at 40Gbps or 100Gbps. Seems to make more sense to handle
1Gbps and 10Gbps links on our MX480, and do the 40Gbps and 100Gbps
Hi Guilano,
I was thrilled to read your post, as we are investigating putting a large
number of MX204s [same RE; half the RAM] and some MX10k3s in our network later
this year.
The financials are quite compelling vs. MX480/960, and so we're about to do
similar testing to what you're currently
Hi
Can we do it on MX as RTG did on EX i.e. active/passive pair of L2 ports
without the need of LACP or xSTP
Kind regards
Bilal
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
We are testing the MX10003 right now.
It is a pretty amazing box.
The routing engine is so power for control plane ... bgp, ospf etc
The timers for BGP to put routes on FIB is something special ( after turbo fib
). With BGP PIC reconvergence is very fast too.
We will test the mpc for traffic
Not that brand new. MPC7-like, which has been around for quite some time.
What should be completely new in this box is the fabric.
The main gotcha is that they are still not shipping it. Same for mx204.
Respectively no software is available publicly for these platforms yet.
It means that you'll
It's not the same chip, as Alexander pointed out. And it's not even
brand new, it's been around for 2 years now.
We are deploying our first 3 units next month and the only "bad" thing
is that you have to use Junos 17.3, so be prepared for an adventure.
But MX10003 is not better than MX960, it's
Hi
Regarding same chipset as mx960:
RE yes x86
PFE a clear no NO it uses a "BRAND NEW" 3rd generation TRIO chipset with 400G
throughput also built into the MX204
Grabbed info from a BDM document in PPT describing both new platforms
Regards
alexander
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
Hi,
After the bad experience with the QFX5100, now our rep is pushing
for MX10003 instead of MX960.
While its half the routing (10T versus 4T), at 1/2 the price, and a
barely 3U in space, for the same chipset (coming from the sales guy).
Anything ring thru? Or we're going
8 matches
Mail list logo
