A quick word of caution, if you use third party optics be very careful moving
to Junos 17. We have found a bunch of ours unusable in Junos 17 and while our
account team has been fantastic in trying to find out what’s changed in the
code the official response has been “non Juniper optic, go away”
Thanks All,
This RPC command works for me via ansible
I used ansible lookup module to take the license content from a file with
the hostname as filename but more advanced use should be to take it
directly from Juniper bulk activation excel based on the serial number
Nitzan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018
Not sure I understand you but both can run 17.3R2 (just time of
installation )
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:16 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 28 mars 2018 19:06 GMT, Nitzan Tzelniker :
>
> > The 5100 run 15.1X53-D63 and the 5110 17.3R2
>
> Do you mean the other way around? No 15.1X53 for the 5100
❦ 28 mars 2018 19:06 GMT, Nitzan Tzelniker :
> The 5100 run 15.1X53-D63 and the 5110 17.3R2
Do you mean the other way around? No 15.1X53 for the 5100.
--
Use statement labels that mean something.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
Thanks!
I'll try with 15.1X53 too.
--
For courage mounteth with occasion.
-- William Shakespeare, "King John"
――― Original Message ―――
From: Nitzan Tzelniker
Sent: 28 mars 2018 19:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP EVPN, VXLAN and ECMP
To: ber...@luffy.cx
Cc: juniper-
Yes I have two routes in vxlan.inet.0
nitzan@qfx5100> show route 10.111.44.222
inet.0: 111 destinations, 111 routes (111 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.111.44.222/32*[OSPF/10] 1w5d 21:39:34, metric 4
> to 10.111.33.99 via et-0
Hey!
Which version of JunOS are you running? I am on 17.4R1. I see that
18.1R1 was just released, I may try it tomorrow. Do you also have
a :vxlan.inet.0 table and does it show two paths too?
In my configuration, I have:
set routing-options forwarding-table export loadbalance
set policy-options
Hi,
Just check with 5110 and 5100 and on both I see two next hops
but I am using OSPF for the underlay
I think that you have multipath under BGP from the fact that we see two
paths under inet.0 but do you have forwarding-table policy with
"load-balance per-packet" ?
BTW take a look here
https://w
On Mar 28, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Sander Steffann wrote:
>
> I tried that, and git an error message back saying eta the license-add
> command is only supported on cli and not over RPC :'(
—Stacy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Thanks Phil!
I knew there was an RPC for this, but hadn’t had the chance to figure it out.
Adam,
Given the info from Phil, you can use a playbook similar to this:
---
- name: 'Add a license to a Junos device'
hosts: junos-all
connection: local
gather_facts: no
roles:
- Juniper.junos
are you having performance issues with other Akamai sites or just with this one?
Can you reply to me off list with the following data:
host whomi.akamai.net (or what IP address this resolves to?)
- Jared
> On Mar 28, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
>
> Is cdn.juniper.net always s
Hi,
> The "xml-name" statement gives the name of the RPC used to access
> this command, which means the RPC adds a
> license from either a URL or a string, and the
> exports license data to a URL.
I tried that, and git an error message back saying eta the license-add command
is only support
Is cdn.juniper.net always slow? It only delivers between 500 and 1000 kilobit
per
second to me while the traceroute looks fine and I am used to much faster
downloads from Akamai:
$ wget
"https://cdn.juniper.net/software/junos/18.1R1.9/junos-install-mx-x86-64-18.1R1.9.tgz[...]";
--2018-03-28 17:3
adamv0...@netconsultings.com writes:
>The problem is I need to hit enter after the license is passed and then also
>^D (ctrl+D) at the end and I'm not sure how would I go about doing that in
>junos_command.
Not sure why these aren't documented but the functionality is there.
Here's the JUNOS DDL
On 28 March 2018 at 11:55, Pierre Emeriaud wrote:
> Gents,
>
> I just noticed an issue on a couple of option B gateways in our
> network. The max-prefix within routing-instances is not enforced. It's
> although taken into account.
>
> This is on M120 running 12.3R6-S3 (yes I know, ancient. No, can
>> Could you try 'maximum-paths' instead? Just as additional datapoint.
Unfortunately, after enabling the maximum-paths 2000 and disabling /
re-enabling the RI, it made no difference:
Mar 28 15:34:38 router rpd[1598]: RPD_RT_PATH_LIMIT_REACHED: Number
of paths (3580) in table CUST-VRF-FOO.inet.0
Hey!
I am trying to setup a Juniper QFX5100 as a VTEP with a very classic
setup. Everything works as expected, but the setup is only using one
possible path from the underlay network.
I have the route to the other VTEP like this:
# run show route 10.16.39.3
inet.0: 240 destinations, 1808 routes
2018-03-28 13:47 GMT+02:00 Saku Ytti :
> Hey,
>
>> This is on M120 running 12.3R6-S3 (yes I know, ancient. No, can't upgrade).
>
> Then I recommend 'set system no-bugs'.
Error. Command not found. Please insert coin to conti^wupgrade.
:)
>> Anyone aware of a PR on this? Is this a known limitation?
Hey,
> This is on M120 running 12.3R6-S3 (yes I know, ancient. No, can't upgrade).
Then I recommend 'set system no-bugs'.
> CUST-VRF-FOO.inet.0: 2594 destinations, 3572 routes (2594 active, 0
> holddown, 0 hidden)
> Limit/Threshold: 2000/1600 destinations
> BGP: 3572 routes,
Gents,
I just noticed an issue on a couple of option B gateways in our
network. The max-prefix within routing-instances is not enforced. It's
although taken into account.
This is on M120 running 12.3R6-S3 (yes I know, ancient. No, can't upgrade).
me@router> show configuration routing-instances C
The problem is I need to hit enter after the license is passed and then also
^D (ctrl+D) at the end and I'm not sure how would I go about doing that in
junos_command.
So I tried to do it with the "shell:" basically creating expect script -that
adds the license but I can't successfully exit.
-it
21 matches
Mail list logo
