[j-nsp] mpls.0 doesn't show LSI as the next hop

2018-05-01 Thread Arie Vayner
Hi, We are trying to get an MX104 to work in a setup which works today on MX240. We have a VRF configured with vrf-table-label, and I can see the label being assigned as well as an LSI interface being created. The issue is that the the mpls.0 table doesn't show the LSI interface as the next hop:

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper M120 - SSD Replacement

2018-05-01 Thread Alain Hebert
    Hi,     I'm guessing juniper's are over priced?     I have yet to yank mine from our MX240 demo to see if a generic one would suffice... - Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7

Re: [j-nsp] migration from cisco VRF+Vrrp to the juniper ACX

2018-05-01 Thread A. Camci
does anyone have an idea why it does not work on Acx( vrf+ vrrp). Br ap Op di 24 apr. 2018 om 10:20 schreef A. Camci > > Hi Guys, >> >> we are migration the Cisco CISCO7606-S to the acx5096. >> But we have 1 customer with VRF and VRRP on the same port. >> >> after migration to the ACX has cus

[j-nsp] Juniper M120 - SSD Replacement

2018-05-01 Thread Juan C. Crespo R.
Hello Guys Could  you please tell me a good SSD replacement for this Routing Engine (RE-A-2000)?? thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 and NetFlow - Any horror story to share?

2018-05-01 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 1 mai 2018 14:30 GMT, Michael Hare  : > chassis { > afeb { > slot 0 { > inline-services { > flow-table-size { > ipv4-flow-table-size 7; > ipv6-flow-table-size

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 and NetFlow - Any horror story to share?

2018-05-01 Thread Michael Hare
Alain, Do you want to collect IPv6? You are probably passed 14.X code on MX104 but I observed that I was unable to change the ipv6-flow-table-size at all (including after reboot). I was able to set flow-table-size in 16.X but my load average on 16.X on MX104 is pretty terrible; seems like I g

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 and NetFlow - Any horror story to share?

2018-05-01 Thread Alain Hebert
    Yeah I had the feeling I would break those MX's.     At this point it is worth it to rebuilt our vMX lab to test the IPFIX variant...     Thanks for the input.     As for routing we have a pretty good mix of T1/T2 providers and we rarely drop sessions so it is providing a pretty good up

Re: [j-nsp] Difference between MPC4E-3D-32XGE-RB and MPC4E-3D-32XGE-SFPP ?

2018-05-01 Thread Nikolas Geyer
Can’t remember the exact numbers but the non-RB card is targeted at MPLS core applications where it’s just high density label switching. Won’t take a full routing table and has reduced L3VPN numbers. Ask your AM/SE for the specifics. Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Apr 2018, at 10:34 am, Brijesh Pa