[j-nsp] Nested route filters (policy-statements)

2018-07-01 Thread Andrew Thrift
Hello List, So I have been using nested firewall filters for a long time now in the format of: term v4-accept-bgp { filter v4-accept-bgp; } from a parent filter statement. This then calls the "v4-accept-bgp" filter. Recently I thought, I wonder if I can do this with policy-statements to

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

2018-07-01 Thread Giuliano C. Medalha
Aaron Witch version of Junos are you running in your ACX5048 boxes ? Is it possible to share it ? Thanks Giuliano From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Aaron Gould Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 1:44:59 AM To: Alexandre Guimaraes Cc: Juniper List Subject: Re: [j-nsp]

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

2018-07-01 Thread Aaron Gould
Not sure what Alexandre is talking about with "vlan leak" I have bought lots of ACX5048 (about 50 of them) and use them as MPLS PE edge... For business Ethernet, cell backhaul, residential broadband, ftth, DSL, cable modem... Mpls l3vpn. Lit up some of the 40 gig interfaces lately too

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

2018-07-01 Thread Alexandre Guimaraes
Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in qfx5100 Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately, with all problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the last breath of cpu after that, all deamons and services going down up

[j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

2018-07-01 Thread Colton Conor
What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise they look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Mixing v4/v6 neighbors in BGP groups

2018-07-01 Thread Sebastian Becker
Hi Rob, We keep the configs separate per address-family. — Sebastian Becker ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp