Hello List,
So I have been using nested firewall filters for a long time now in the
format of:
term v4-accept-bgp {
filter v4-accept-bgp;
}
from a parent filter statement. This then calls the "v4-accept-bgp"
filter.
Recently I thought, I wonder if I can do this with policy-statements to
Aaron
Witch version of Junos are you running in your ACX5048 boxes ?
Is it possible to share it ?
Thanks
Giuliano
From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Aaron
Gould
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 1:44:59 AM
To: Alexandre Guimaraes
Cc: Juniper List
Subject: Re: [j-nsp]
Not sure what Alexandre is talking about with "vlan leak"
I have bought lots of ACX5048 (about 50 of them) and use them as MPLS PE
edge... For business Ethernet, cell backhaul, residential broadband, ftth, DSL,
cable modem... Mpls l3vpn. Lit up some of the 40 gig interfaces lately too
Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in qfx5100
Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately, with all
problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the last breath
of cpu after that, all deamons and services going down up
What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise they
look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the
ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Hi Rob,
We keep the configs separate per address-family.
—
Sebastian Becker
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
6 matches
Mail list logo