Re: [j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

Please see inline. > On 2018-Jul-15, at 15:02, James Bensley wrote: > > On 15 July 2018 at 11:12, wrote: >> @James is on my todo list so maybe we can exchange notes, (I plan on using >> it in RSVP-TE environment so the added complexity will be only marginal). >> Yes I've been waiting for

Re: [j-nsp] Segment Routing Real World Deployment (was: VPC mc-lag)

On 12/Jul/18 13:04, Saku Ytti wrote: > I believe you're right, that there isn't really anything there. But > I'd love to be wrong. Yes, BIER is not yet available, so you'd still need to maintain IP in the core for Multicast. > I see no reason why NG-MVPN couldn't have SR tunnel /

Re: [j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

On 15 July 2018 at 11:12, wrote: > @James is on my todo list so maybe we can exchange notes, (I plan on using > it in RSVP-TE environment so the added complexity will be only marginal). > Yes I've been waiting for this feature for quite some time in cisco (got > promises that maybe on SR) -maybe

Re: [j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

On 15 July 2018 at 12:47, Saku Ytti wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 at 13:12, wrote: Hi Saku, Adam, >> > a) If P2->PE2 goes down, we have to wait for PE1 to experience it, after >> PE1 >> > experiences it, it can immediately redirect to PE3 >> > b) If PE2->CE2 goes down, PE2 should be able to

Re: [j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

Hi, Egress protection was presented at NANOG71: https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG71/1451/20171004_Szarkowicz_Fast_Egress_Protection_v1.pdf

Re: [j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 at 13:12, wrote: > > a) If P2->PE2 goes down, we have to wait for PE1 to experience it, after > PE1 > > experiences it, it can immediately redirect to PE3 > > b) If PE2->CE2 goes down, PE2 should be able to redirect to PE3 > > > But this feature solves only egress PE node

Re: [j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

> Of Saku Ytti > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2018 10:32 AM > > Hey James, > > Thanks, I was not aware of this feature. How does it compare to PIC Edge? > Aren't both solving issue of ingress node rapidly choosing different egress > node from two installed options? > > I think we have two

Re: [j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

Hey James, Thanks, I was not aware of this feature. How does it compare to PIC Edge? Aren't both solving issue of ingress node rapidly choosing different egress node from two installed options? I think we have two secenarios: P2---PE2--CE2 | | CE1 -- PE1 --

[j-nsp] Egress Protection/Service Mirroring

Hi All, Has anyone used Egress Protection/Service Mirroring, anyone got any stories they can share good or bad? To clarify, I'm talking about: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-minto-2547-egress-node-fast-protection-03