Cool, yeah, my gosh I like eve more than lsys at this point
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
The new jcl (Juniper Cloud labs) looks like a lot to eve ng, hope to give
it a look soon.
Le lundi 16 juillet 2018, Christian Scholz a écrit :
> Welcome to the world of EVE.
> I prepped my JNCIE purely with EVE ;)
>
>
>
>
> > Am 16.07.2018 um 14:16 schrieb Aaron Gould :
> >
> > Oh my gosh, Eve-n
Welcome to the world of EVE.
I prepped my JNCIE purely with EVE ;)
> Am 16.07.2018 um 14:16 schrieb Aaron Gould :
>
> Oh my gosh, Eve-ng is awesome! If you didn't know about it, you gotta try
> it. It's so cool in its ability to run vSRX and vMX so far in my testing.
> In only a short couple
Saku Ytti writes:
> Generally yes. But then there are some debatable things like IP
> options and DHCP snooping. Which are transit, but subject to RE. So
> should they be subject to LO0, or should you just police them in
> forwarding-filters? I believe latter, Juniper seems to think former.
I m
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 at 16:32, Benny Lyne Amorsen
wrote:
> Ideally JunOS should offer another way of distinguishing between forward
> traffic and locally-terminated/originated traffic in ACL's, without
> having to rely on getting lists of IP addresses correct. The box knows
> whether it is termina
Pavel Lunin writes:
> It's not maintaining scripts which is a bit of pain. It's on-box automaton
> which is hell a lot of pain and there is very little reason to use it
> nowadays. At least at any larger scale than a SOHO gateway for ten users,
> doing something useless.
That is all the more rea
On 12/Jul/18 23:07, Pavel Lunin wrote:
> That's normal. Government and financial sectors always use the most
> outdated solutions because of bureaucracy, compliance, certifications and
> all those WTF reasons :)
Probably with a big fat vendor (or vendor-partner) 10-year management &
support co
On 12/Jul/18 18:46, Phil Bedard wrote:
> This is from an industry perspective and not specific to Juniper. BIER won't
> really happen without hardware support which is coming but will not be
> compatible with a lot of already deployed hardware.
Yes, this is what I have found so far, maki
Oh my gosh, Eve-ng is awesome! If you didn't know about it, you gotta try
it. It's so cool in its ability to run vSRX and vMX so far in my testing.
In only a short couple days I've been able to test the following.
- mpls martini l2circuits using ldp
- mpls vpls bgp ad/ldp sig (rfc4762)
- mpls vp
9 matches
Mail list logo