For my EX4600s i used:
https://www.racksolutions.com/2post-center-mount-brackets.html
Which I found to be very sturdy and good for multiple RUs of equipment.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:05 AM Colton Conor wrote:
> Brian, are you talking about this kit:
>
Have you considered EX4600?
It is like a QFX5100 but with less feature support. I have 2x in an MC-LAG
which has been great, but it supports Virtual Chassis too.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:44 AM Giovanni Bellac via juniper-nsp <
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we have migrated
Be aware on the QFX5110 that L3 VXLAN is limited, You cannot route vxlan to
vlan:
https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent=PR1318178
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:51 PM Brant Ian Stevens <
bra...@argentiumsolutions.com> wrote:
> And now there's the announcement of the QFX5120
I would highly recommend going with QFX5110 instead of QFX5100 – same
everything but QFX5110 offers L3 VXLAN which QFX5100 does not. I know you do
not need this today, but down the road who knows. EVPN/VXLAN appears to be the
new architecture for most networks, plus QFX5110 has QSFP28
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 10:30:16 +
Chris Adams wrote:
> I've got an old MX80 running the JTAC recommended release 15.1R7, but
> that has a USB bug (PR 108) that is causing crashes. The PR says it
> is fixed in 16.1R4 and 17.1R1, but I was wondering what releases other
> people might be
On 3/Aug/18 16:39, Giovanni Bellac via juniper-nsp wrote:
>
> We want to keep simplicity in and therefore want to use VC. We are pushing
> some Gbit/s from Rack-to-Rack (backups) and to our two upstreams around
> 500-600Mbit/s.
> QFX5100 hardware seems to be MUCH better than EX4550 hardware.
I've got an old MX80 running the JTAC recommended release 15.1R7, but
that has a USB bug (PR 108) that is causing crashes. The PR says it
is fixed in 16.1R4 and 17.1R1, but I was wondering what releases other
people might be running and recommend on the MX80 these days.
--
Chris Adams
7 matches
Mail list logo
