Hi,
Attached is my MPLS Auto B/w Configuration and i see frequent path changes
and cpu spikes. I have a small network and wanted to know if there is any
optimization/best practices i could follow to reduce the churn.
protocols {
mpls {
statistics {
file mpls.statistics
CPU utilization on DPDK Applications (like vMX) is not a good way of
representing utilization. vMX uses Poll mode drivers which consume all of the
CPU cycles on a given thread whether there is 1 packet or 4 million.
If you are looking to link utilization, packet or bps I/O is better.
Thanks,
Hi
Is any way to (i.e. CLI command) to display CPU cores utilization for vMX ?
I just know 'show pfe statistics traffic bandwidth" - but it's display
amount of traffic vs installed vMX license.
Rob
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 01:54:45PM +0100, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> With regards to Gert's caveat "we're too small to build a lab..."
> There are two kinds of testing that can be done,
> 1) concept testing
> 2) performance and scale testing
>
> Virtual lab is perfect for concept
Hi Adam,
I do not agree with your praise for the vm lab.
When I think of the last (real) issues in our network or things that
fucked up with Software-Upgrades, in most of the cases testing it with an
virtual device before would not have helped at all.
Some samples:
We had 2x MX960 that failed
Hello.
One question reagrding this and Junipers offerings in the virtual appliance
field. Even though I agree with the statement, when looking at Ciscos offering
in virtual appliances for lab and testing purposes I find that a lot of the
functionality isn't there especially when we are
Well...
From my experience with QFX5100, Q-inQ, does not work at all, only
one(in one) vlan have the right to pass(VXLAN), L2TP Protocols don't have the
rights to pass, funny thing
For years I discuss with local Juniper representative or Juniper team
itself... but... no
Hi,
On QFX5100 the L2TP/Q-in-Q services has limitations. I have to dig
through my pile of tickets for details... but I remember something
about PVST+ packets not being forwarded at all.
So we just switched everything to MPLS/l2circuits/VLAN CCC (for
now) instead of battling
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of Karl Gerhard
>
> Hello
>
> I am experimenting with BGP PIC before deploying it to production and I
> have found an oddity:
> With "set routing-options protect core" local-preference stops
10 matches
Mail list logo
