Re: [j-nsp] Use cases for IntServ in MPLS backbones

Adam- There are a couple of clever Diffserv-TE (what your calling IntServ) deployments out there. Both RDM & MAM are deployed. Truthfully, they are pretty quiet, mainly, because the upfront planning that is required to go into them and the relative lack of variations in the deployments.

[j-nsp] Use cases for IntServ in MPLS backbones

Hi folks, Another pooling question from me, This time I'm interested on what are your thoughts on DiffServ vs IntServ in MPLS backbones and what use cases for IntServ can you think of please. So what I have in mind specifically is RSVP-TE in combination with DiffServ (standard QoS) vs IntServ

Re: [j-nsp] help with routing bypassing bgp path selection

On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 06:49, tim tiriche wrote: > > hello, > > i have 5 PE routers running with full iBGP/RSVP-TE MPLS Mesh. > > There is a CE connected to PE5 and PE4. > > Based on BGP Path selection all of the PE {1,2,3,4} are preferring route to > PE5 due to BGP Path selection based on AS PATH

Re: [j-nsp] help with routing bypassing bgp path selection

Hey, I'd go with BGP policy. On PE1 ingress increase local-pref for PE4? You could also have iBGP-IN policy like this: from community increase-local-pref-in-local-pe then local-preference add 100 and per PE community: set increase-local-pref-in-local-pe members large:MYAS:42:MYLOOP And then