On 1/9/19 6:14 AM, Niall Donaghy wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I can give you a few hints:
>
> DPCE will perform poorly, depending on how many policers you
> instantiate.
> (hint: 10K will kill it, and hint: policers will not be accurate).
> MPCs will perform better but don't burden more than
On 1/9/19 7:37 AM, Alexander Arseniev via juniper-nsp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Well, the prefix-action policers would likely relieve congestion on
> Your backhaul MW links but the 100Mbps "last mile" will still be
> congested, with a mix of good and bad packets.
>
> And I would say more bad than good be
A dirty hack to move behaviour back to expected is to put the host-name in
as a FQDN and delete domain-name.
Seems not to affect anything else (domain-search helps resolution of naked
hostnames in commands), and both LLDP and SNMP report the same value.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 12:56, James Stapley
Not sure if we're the first people to notice this, but there seems to be a
change in the way Junos deals with FQDN, host-name and domain-name with our
latest kit.
tl;dr:
On MX204, running 18.1R3-S2.5, LLDP System Name and SNMP sysName are not
consistent, with LLDP System name having the domain-nam
4 matches
Mail list logo
