Re: [j-nsp] JunOS on EX4550?

Thanks, Richard. Any particular reason why I would be better off using 12.3R12? On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:53 PM Richard McGovern wrote: > No. For legacy EX switches, for which EX4500/EX4550 fall into, 15.1 is > last release. At the same time, I think you might have best results using >

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS on EX4550?

--- Begin Message --- No. For legacy EX switches, for which EX4500/EX4550 fall into, 15.1 is last release. At the same time, I think you might have best results using 12.3R12-S[latest] instead. Both 12.3 and 15.1 will be maintained for life of legacy EX switches. HTH, Rich Richard McGovern

Re: [j-nsp] rfc8097 (rpki) communities ?

--- Begin Message --- > On Mar 5, 2019, at 02:04, Job Snijders wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 04:17:19PM +0300, Alexandre Snarskii wrote: >> Somewhat stupid question: while experimenting with rpki, I found that >> while rfc8097 declares origin validation state as extended community >>

Re: [j-nsp] FlowSpec and RTBH

--- Begin Message --- Marcin, > On Oct 9, 2019, at 07:26, Marcin Głuc wrote: > I was wondering is there a way to export family flow routes (from > inetflow.0) to non flowspec BGP speaker? > For example tag Flowspec route with community and advertise this route with > different community to

Re: [j-nsp] Junos Telemetry Interface (JTI)

Response to old thread and referencing my new thread… “[j-nsp] telemetry analytics - mx960 - npu packet rate concerns” My JTI/OpenNTI systems seems to be continuing to run nicely. I use it when I really need to know some details. In the new thread I mentioned above, I was curious

[j-nsp] JunOS on EX4550?

Is it possible (and recommended) to run anything newer than 15.1 on EX4550 (which is what the JTAC-recommended version currently is). ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp