Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] firewall filter misses connected interface addresses

2019-12-09 Thread Anderson, Charles R
I use something like this so the same firewall filter is applied on all lo0.* interfaces of all VRFs and logical-systems: set groups RE-FILTER logical-systems <*> interfaces lo0 unit <*> family inet filter input ROUTING-ENGINE set groups RE-FILTER logical-systems <*> interfaces lo0 unit <*>

Re: [j-nsp] EX2300 Code

2019-12-09 Thread Emille Blanc
We've not had any issues (so far) with either 15.1X53-D5​1, or 18.2R2.6. Only using them for L2 distribution or QinQ, though. So your mileage may vary. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Philippe Girard Sent: Monday, December

Re: [j-nsp] EX2300 Code

2019-12-09 Thread Philippe Girard
A note on that. Not only does the switch stop responding and needs to be power cycled, but in our case while this happens uplink ports on a redundant ring bridge BPDUs from working switches and you get a nice linerate traffic loop going. We also use those as OOB management for our MX routers

Re: [j-nsp] Multicast control with IGMP snooping

2019-12-09 Thread Larry Jones
See this: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/configura tion-statement/multicast-router-interface-igmp-snooping.html -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Norman Elton Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 06:03 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] firewall filter misses connected interface addresses

2019-12-09 Thread Andreas
Hello Mike, if you're using that lo0.0 in a routing-instance or use more than one loopback you could also run into these restrictions: - If you configure Filter A on the default loopback interface and Filter B on the VRF loopback interface, the VRF routing instance uses Filter B. - If you

Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] firewall filter misses connected interface addresses

2019-12-09 Thread Anderson, Charles R
What hardware and software version? There were some bugs/limitations with certain combinations. On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 07:42:02AM -0800, Mike wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem getting junos to filter out admin access to my router > from unauthorized addresses. > > I have some addresses

Re: [j-nsp] EX2300 Code

2019-12-09 Thread Nelson, Brian
If Juniper provides a version which is stable for more that a few weeks let me know. I've been chasing version upgrades for months now. Brian Nelson On 12/9/19 5:15 AM, William wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the process of getting our first stack of EX2300s ready for > production, can anyone recommend

Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] Multicast control with IGMP snooping

2019-12-09 Thread Anderson, Charles R
You can try moving the IGMP querier function from the router to a switch. Also refrain from using multicast-router-interface on the uplink port to the router. These may help, although they mention QFX and SRX. I'm not sure if EX-series is supported for this feature (but the command is there

[j-nsp] firewall filter misses connected interface addresses

2019-12-09 Thread Mike
Hello, I have a problem getting junos to filter out admin access to my router from unauthorized addresses. I have some addresses bound to lo0.0 which I am advertising internally in my igp, and which are the 'official' addresses used for SNMP, SSH and BGP to the router. I have firewall filters

[j-nsp] Multicast control with IGMP snooping

2019-12-09 Thread Norman Elton
Hello, In a fairly large EX switching environment, we're using IGMP snooping to constrain some AV-over-IP multicast traffic. It's quite bandwidth-intensive, so we obviously don't want it broadcasting over our L2 network. According to The Rules, multicast traffic gets sent to any subscribed host

Re: [j-nsp] EX2300 Code

2019-12-09 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 11:15:01AM +, William wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the process of getting our first stack of EX2300s ready for > production, can anyone recommend any specific versions of junos to run > on them? > > I'm not taking advantage of any advance features, just after something >

Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] Re: MX204 MACsec

2019-12-09 Thread Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
--- Begin Message --- This appears to be a SW issue, as MX204 does NOT have any MACsec support. As Chuck said, SW sure error in some manner, like non-supported platform etc. Even though the config is allowed, nothing will happen in terms of MACsec - no HW support. Rich Richard McGovern Sr

Re: [j-nsp] EX2300 Code

2019-12-09 Thread Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Use 18.2R3-S2 Richard McGovern Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks 978-618-3342 I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good I don’t make the news, I just report it On 12/9/19, 6:15 AM, "William" wrote: Hi, I am in the process of getting our

[j-nsp] EX2300 Code

2019-12-09 Thread William
Hi, I am in the process of getting our first stack of EX2300s ready for production, can anyone recommend any specific versions of junos to run on them? I'm not taking advantage of any advance features, just after something stable :) Cheers, William