Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] EX4300: Framing error with macsec enabled

2020-04-21 Thread Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Thanks Chuck Richard McGovern Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks 978-618-3342 I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good I don’t make the news, I just report it On 4/21/20, 11:53 AM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote: [External Email. Be cautious of content]

Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] EX4300: Framing error with macsec enabled

2020-04-21 Thread Chuck Anderson
As I said, I'm not excluding any protocols from MACsec. With that configuration, LLDP apparently doesn't work "outside the tunnel"--I never see any directly attached neighbors. LLDP does work between the MACsec endpoints--they show as if they are directly connected neighbors. I'm fine with

Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] EX4300: Framing error with macsec enabled

2020-04-21 Thread james list
Hi Richard lldp and lacp are excluded: > > @EX4300-A> show configuration security macsec | display set > > set security macsec connectivity-association MAC security-mode static-cak > > set security macsec connectivity-association MAC pre-shared-key ckn > > set security macsec

Re: [j-nsp] [EXT] EX4300: Framing error with macsec enabled

2020-04-21 Thread Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Chuck, I thought you were running both LLDP and LACP outside the MACSEC tunnel, no? (Optional) Exclude a protocol from MACsec: [edit security macsec connectivity-association connectivity-association-name] user@switch# set exclude-protocol protocol-name For instance, if you

Re: [j-nsp] Buffer Size

2020-04-21 Thread John Kristoff
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:58:02 + Mohammad Khalil wrote: > Am trying to conduct a comparison for campus refresh , my end customer is > deeply interested in deep details. > He is interested to know the buffer size of Juniper switches (EX series) > and I could not find such a piece of information

Re: [j-nsp] Buffer Size

2020-04-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 21/Apr/20 11:49, Tore Anderson wrote: > > The vendor is usually irrelevant. Implying that Arista have better/bigger > buffers than Juniper is misleading - it depends on the ASIC used. For > example, the Juniper EX4600 and the Arista 7050X both contain a TD2 ASIC, so > they both have a 12

Re: [j-nsp] Buffer Size

2020-04-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 21/Apr/20 11:49, Saku Ytti wrote: > You probably didn't mean it, but people will read this as you imply > ANET does something different to JNPR. If you are comparing EX4600 > (on-chip only) to Arista Jericho (off-chip), that is an entirely > unfair comparison. ANET also has on-chip buffer

Re: [j-nsp] Buffer Size

2020-04-21 Thread Tore Anderson
* Mark Tinka > On 20/Apr/20 22:58, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > >> Hi all >> Am trying to conduct a comparison for campus refresh , my end customer is >> deeply interested in deep details. >> He is interested to know the buffer size of Juniper switches (EX series) >> and I could not find such a

Re: [j-nsp] Buffer Size

2020-04-21 Thread Saku Ytti
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 12:31, Mark Tinka wrote: > > If anyone has an idea it would be appreciated. > > Atrocious - on the 2 we ran; EX4550 and EX4600. > > We dumped it and went with Arista. You probably didn't mean it, but people will read this as you imply ANET does something different to

Re: [j-nsp] Buffer Size

2020-04-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 20/Apr/20 22:58, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > Hi all > Am trying to conduct a comparison for campus refresh , my end customer is > deeply interested in deep details. > He is interested to know the buffer size of Juniper switches (EX series) > and I could not find such a piece of information in