Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine Protection

Hello Rolf, I followed your suggestion and it worked as expected. Thank you very much Em qui., 17 de set. de 2020 às 14:24, Roger Wiklund escreveu: > > Hi > > Here's the general behaviour in Junos: (routing) > https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=KB23547 > > However, QFX5k is

Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine Protection

Hi Here's the general behaviour in Junos: (routing) https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=KB23547 However, QFX5k is different:

Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine Protection

Hi Cristian, did you try to apply a filter on both interfaces, i.e. add some accept-all filter for lo0.0? I read that the lo0.0 filter is also used in the other instances if there is no own filter set, but not if this applies vice-versa (at least it seams to be the case). kind regards Rolf >

Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine Protection

I forgot to mention, that I'm using the QFX5120 equipment in this scenario Em qui., 17 de set. de 2020 às 10:19, Cristian Cardoso escreveu: > > Hi > I am trying to create a firewall filter to protect the routing engine > only in a routing-instance, and with that I apply the firewall filter > in

[j-nsp] Routing Engine Protection

Hi I am trying to create a firewall filter to protect the routing engine only in a routing-instance, and with that I apply the firewall filter in the lo0.1 interface. I noticed that when applying the filter that in theory should only apply to the routing-instance, it also ends up dropping packets