Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

> > On 18/04/2022, at 3:49 AM, James via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > > From: James mailto:ja...@nexril.net>> > Subject: Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors > Date: 18 April 2022 at 3:49:44 AM NZST > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

I don't quite understand. Why don't you just export the static into your routing protocol? How is the static route a "fallback" if it is really the active route? On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 8:57 AM James via juniper-nsp < juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > > -- Forwarded message --

[j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

--- Begin Message --- Hi all, I have two routes in inet.0, neither of which come from BGP: 10.200.7.2/32 *[Static/5] 00:14:40 > to 10.200.7.2 via irb.102 [EVPN/7] 00:08:25 > via irb.102 I want to advertise the 'EVPN/7' route, eit