Re: [j-nsp] Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP peering Sessions?

2023-09-26 Thread Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 03:50, Barry Greene via juniper-nsp wrote: > Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP > peering Sessions? > > I’m not touching routers right now. I’m wondering if anyone has deployed, > your experiences, and thoughts? For the longest time

Re: [j-nsp] Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP peering Sessions?

2023-09-26 Thread Chris Kawchuk via juniper-nsp
FWIW -- We've asked for that feature now in any RFP/RFQs we send to the usual gang of $vendors. Thats our method to get adoption, else they get a black-mark/non-comply in the [BGP section] when it comes time to score the responses. - CK. > On 27 Sep 2023, at 10:49, Barry Greene via

[j-nsp] Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP peering Sessions?

2023-09-26 Thread Barry Greene via juniper-nsp
Hi Team, Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP peering Sessions? I’m not touching routers right now. I’m wondering if anyone has deployed, your experiences, and thoughts? This is suppose to be the “replacement” for BGP MD5, ‘but’ I’m hearing ….. 1. The