>
> I am aware of a few major orders of the ACX7024 that Juniper are working
> on. Of course, none of it will become materially evidential until the
> end of 2024. That said, I think HP will give the box a chance, as there
> is a market for it. They might just put a time line on it.
>
I doubt
Richard just reports the news, and at risk of keeping this thread a live, I
thought I'd give our real word experiences.
I've upgraded both newer "licensed based" mx204s and perpetual pre-sku-change
mx204's to 22.4. I can attest regardless I had no problems with BGP or
anything else. All of
Hopefully not enforced!! Just FYI, but one of the advantages of Flex SW License
scheme is ability to move license from one SN to another. In License Portal you
“should” be able to revoke an applied Flex license and then apply that Flex
license to another SN. You should then me removing the
On 10/01/2024 22:41, Richard McGovern wrote:
Hopefully this helps, and explains a little of the history of how MX
got to where it is today, and beyond.
Thanks for the insight! this helps :)
As I only need it for spare I will probably just go for the
MX204-HW-BASE and ignore the warning
On 1/11/24 02:56, Chris Kawchuk via juniper-nsp wrote:
Shall we start taking bets on what stays, and what goes?
I'm glad that Rami gets to stay as CEO for the networking side of
things. Good lad, that...
Again, ACX was never a competitor to the ASR920 which I know Mr Tinka was very fond
5 matches
Mail list logo
