All very good information. Thanks guys for all the replies. very helpful.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 6:42 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 2/8/24 16:29, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> In absence of more specifics, junos by default doesn't discard but
> reject.
>
>
> Right, which I wanted to clarify if it does
>
> Is the same true for VMware?
>
Never tried it there myself.
be able to run a
> solid software-only OS than be a test-bed for cRPD in such a use-case.
AFAIK, cRPD is part of the same build pipeline as 'full' JUNOS, so if
there's a bug in any given version, it will catch you on Juniper's
On 2/8/24 17:10, Tom Beecher wrote:
For any use cases that you want protocol interaction, but not
substantive traffic forwarding capabilities , cRPD is by far the
better option.
It can handle around 1M total RIB/FIB using around 2G RAM, right in
Docker or k8. The last version of vMX I
>
> I wouldn't consider cRPD for production. vRR (or vMX, if it's still a
> thing) seems to make more sense.
>
For any use cases that you want protocol interaction, but not substantive
traffic forwarding capabilities , cRPD is by far the better option.
It can handle around 1M total RIB/FIB using
On 2/8/24 16:29, Saku Ytti wrote:
In absence of more specifics, junos by default doesn't discard but
reject.
Right, which I wanted to clarify if it does the same thing with this
specific feature, or if it does "discard"
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 16:07, Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
wrote:
> So internally, if it attracts any traffic for non-specific destinations,
> does Junos send it /dev/null in hardware? I'd guess so...
In absence of more specifics, junos by default doesn't discard but
reject. There is essentially
Correcting myself, yes, it’s discard.
-- Jeff
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Mark Tinka
Date: Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 9:07 AM
To: Jeff Haas , Lee Starnes ,
"juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP announcements
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
On 2/8/24 15:48, Jeff Haas wrote:
It’s rib-only. If you wanted the usual other properties, you’d use
the usual other features.
So internally, if it attracts any traffic for non-specific destinations,
does Junos send it /dev/null in hardware? I'd guess so...
Mark.
It’s rib-only. If you wanted the usual other properties, you’d use the usual
other features.
-- Jeff
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Mark Tinka
Date: Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 12:14 AM
To: Jeff Haas , Lee Starnes ,
"juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX204 and IPv6 BGP
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 10:16, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Is the MX150 still a current product? My understanding is it's an x86
> platform running vMX.
No longer orderable.
--
++ytti
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 2/8/24 09:56, Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp wrote:
Same concerns, I would just push it back and be a late adopter. Rock
existing vRR while supported, not pre-empt into cRPD because vendor
says that's the future. Let someone else work with the vendor to
ensure feature parity and indeed perhaps
On 2/8/24 09:56, Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp wrote:
Same concerns, I would just push it back and be a late adopter. Rock
existing vRR while supported, not pre-empt into cRPD because vendor
says that's the future. Let someone else work with the vendor to
ensure feature parity and indeed perhaps
On 2/8/24 09:50, Roger Wiklund via juniper-nsp wrote:
Hi
I'm curious, when moving from vRR to cRPD, how do you plan to manage/setup
the infrastructure that cRPD runs on?
I run cRPD on my laptop for nothing really useful apart from testing
configuration commands, e.t.c.
I wouldn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
