Re: [j-nsp] BGP route announcements and Blackholes

2024-03-19 Thread Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 19:44, Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp wrote: > The blackhole peer does receive the /32 announcement, but the aggregate > route also becomes discarded and thus routes to the other peers stop > working. I couldn't follow this, and the output you shared didn't support it. So it

Re: [j-nsp] BGP route announcements and Blackholes

2024-03-19 Thread dip via juniper-nsp
What about no-install https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/cli-reference/topics/ref/statement/no-install-edit-protocols.html ? On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp < juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Hello Juniper gurus. I am seeing an issue where

[j-nsp] BGP route announcements and Blackholes

2024-03-19 Thread Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp
Hello Juniper gurus. I am seeing an issue where we have a carrier that does RTBH via BGP announcement rather than community strings. This is done via BGP peer to a blackhole BGP router/server. My issue here is that our aggregate IP block that is announced to our backbone providers gets impacted