David-
I've experienced this about 7 times in the past two years, all on J-series
routers purchased in the 2008-2009 time period... whether it was a
clean/coordinating power-off or if it was an unexpected power loss / UPS
run-out.
JTAC originally thought it was a memory issue, as there is a PSN
Without seeing your actual ping command, I'm assuming you forgot to
include the logical-system parameter so the router knows what
logical-system to use as the source.
Alternatively, look at the set cli command to make your CLI feel
like your are actually logged into the logical-system as a
If you're running the 10.4 variant that has the dual boot partitions, no
USB key is needed.
Just change your command to: show system snapshot media internal
~Adam
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Skeeve Stevens
skeeve+juniper...@eintellego.net wrote:
Excellent Julian.
btw. Doing the show
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think you're looking for next-header for your
protocol match.
term T1 {
from {
next-header tcp;
destination-port ssh;
}
then {
count T1;
accept;
}
}
~Adam
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Justin M. Streiner
On Aug 12, 2011, at 14:36, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
With 10.4R3 and newer dual-root partitioning feature, on initial
upgrade most of my EX switches formatted upgraded both the primary
and alternate root slices correctly. However, subsequent upgrades
don't appear to keep those in
I realize this will sound silly, but have you checked for half-duplex
on your interfaces?
Those onboard J6350 interfaces are actually 10/100/1000, so if you
don't have the speed and link-mode hardcoded, do a show interfaces
extensive ge-0/0/# and check the link partner section to ensure you're
What type of interfaces and number of each type do you plan on terminate on
the device? Throughput? Services?
~Adam
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Dwater dwater2...@gmail.com wrote:
Which juniper router fits in place of 7206? We are planning to put juniper
routers in.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jonathan Lassoff j...@thejof.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Adam Leff a...@leff.co wrote:
Also, for what it's worth, I do have multiple logical interfaces under
st0
(i.e. st0.0 and st0.1) and it is working without requiring NHTB.
Without NHTB
Jonathan-
I believe you need to look into NHTB (Next-Hop Tunnel Binding) that will
allow you to use the one st0.0 interface but bind multiple tunnels.
Check out the following doc:
in the proper
security zone, a route pointed down st0.1 for the traffic to be tunneled,
etc.?
~Adam
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Adam Leff a...@leff.co wrote:
Jonathan-
I believe you need to look into NHTB (Next-Hop Tunnel Binding) that will
allow you to use the one st0.0 interface but bind
10 matches
Mail list logo
