Re: [j-nsp] J-series: number of policers ?

> Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:24:30 +0400 > From: Alexandre Snarskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [j-nsp] J-series: number of policers ? > To: Juniper-NSP Mailing list > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > Hi! > > J-Series DRAM Usage Gu

Re: [j-nsp] j4350 not reporting destination interface in netflow records *BUMP*

Hi, Sorry to bump this.. but surely somebody out there is using netflow with J series routers and getting both input and output interface IDs in their records? - Hi, I am having problems with missing destination interface index numbers. They are always set to 0. Source interface i

[j-nsp] j4350 not reporting destination interface in netflow records

Hi, I am having problems with missing destination interface index numbers. They are always set to 0. Source interface index numbers appear to be fine and correct. My configuration is roughly as follows: ge-0/0/1 { speed 10m; link-mode full-duplex; gigether-optio

[j-nsp] EBGP multihop, prevent next-hop self on advertisement to an IBGP peer

Hi all, I am having a problem with a J series router. I have a network as below: R1---mp-ibgpR2multihop-ebgpR3 The ebgp session between R2 and R3 is a normal EBGP multihop session. Let us say that it is between a PE and another box located somewhere on the internet. The mp-ibgp s