Re: [j-nsp] Port mirring on MX80 to tagged interface

Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Port mirring on MX80 to tagged interface On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) kayssar.ben_hamm...@nsn.com wrote: Hi Chris, I have the below config running on MX80 without

Re: [j-nsp] Internet access SRX

Hi Mohammad, You need to add from routing-instance default on the normal NAT rule, it work for me on 10.4 : NSN@TSA3-GIFWA9002# show security nat source rule-set rs-trust_2_untrust from zone TRUST; to zone UNTRUST; rule nat-trust_2_untrust_10_0 { match { source-address lo0 ;

[j-nsp] Maximum session capacity in SRX cluster

Dears, I know that in SRX cluster , if node 0 create a session , another session in standby mode is created on node 1 , does this mean that capacity on a cluster in term of supported session is same as capacity of one node ? Br BEN HAMMADI Kayssar   NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS Lead Engineer

[j-nsp] BGP Convergeance on SRX3600

Dears , Is there an equivalent to BGP fast-external failover and BGP PIC on Juniper SRX ? Br. BEN HAMMADI Kayssar   NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS Lead Engineer -BroadBand Connectivity JNCIE-M (#471), JNCIE-SP (#1147), CCIP Mobile : +216 29 349 952 / +216 98 349 952 FIX  : +216 71 108 173

[j-nsp] SRX src nat pool subnet load sharing

Dears , I need some details about SRX src nat pool @ allocation , We are using a proxy that go oout with only one src @ and we use oversubscription nat on SRX using a pool that contain 2 subnets : as per my understanding of the normal SRX behavior the second subnet will never be used

Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 port mirroring on MX960

Hi, Does junos have the cisco limitation of 2 SPAN session per plateform ? Br. Kayssar -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ext Terry Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 4:02 AM To: Sivasankar

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF import policy

Hi, I am getting this work but on SRX 3600 10.4R7.5 : area 0.0.0.1 { nssa summaries; network-summary-export To-OSPF-A1; interface reth0.1767; } policy-options policy-statement To-OSPF-A1 term 1 { from { protocol ospf; route-filter X.X.X.X/Y exact; }

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

You can use normal subinterface and assign it to the routing instance -Original Message- From: ext Walaa Abdel razzak [mailto:wala...@bmc.com.sa] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:18 PM To: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis); Sean Clarke Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Routers Question

Assalamou 3alykom , how are you doing ? For routers that have simple configuration ( simple CE for exemple ) you can use routing-instance whith type virtual-router included in a logical router Br. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net