-3.56 is fine, question is what are they seeing at their end on the rx?
quite possibly you have some unwanted attenuation along the path between
your optic(tx->) and their optic(->rx).
Ben
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Good One wrote:
>
>
> I am trying to find out what is causing my link to g
Ok fair point, locally originated attacks are bad no matter you have some
times.
I'll stop hijacking this thread and let the OP get on with their choice :)
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Ben Steele wrote:
>
> > an
ou require, but remember not everyone runs @
line-rate :)
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Ben Steele wrote:
>
> > I can't see it having a problem with non-sampled netflow but if you are
> really worried about that
>
If budget is a real concern..
Assuming you are not planning on pumping tiny packets through this (ie
dedicated voip router etc.) maybe you should take a look at something like a
Cisco 3845, will do close to 300Mbs at 64-byte packets(so obviously a lot
more with standard profile traffic sizes) and
For 15k get yourself an NPE-G2, it's not worth moving platforms and your
already invested 7200 modules for that money and you won't get as good a
bang for buck buying a new juniper as opposed to if you just upgrade the
NPE, the G2 will give you more than enough performance and includes 3 Gb
ports o
Hi Juniper guru's
I am a Cisco guy currently trying to resolve a Juniper BGP issue J
Device I have is a NetScreen-204, I just want to confirm the process for
applying an outbound route-map to bgp neighbours, I am going to read up
myself on how to do it but would appreciate any real world qu
6 matches
Mail list logo