Re: [j-nsp] Logical Tunnels & IPv6

Hi We ran into this one as well - JunOS 9.3 on an MX480 We couldn't get the logical tunnel between logical systems to take an IPv6 address unless we used encapsulation frame-relay - no other appeared to work. Why this was our Juniper rep couldn't answer - just pointed us at the frame-relay worka

Re: [j-nsp] EX 8200 deployment

gt; de-soldering and replacing the internal flash :) > Heh. Sounds like fun - maybe with a unit once it gets older/off warranty/maintenance. Take care Brian Fitzgerald ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Routing Instance for fxp0

have much experience with those platforms. Hope that helps Brian Fitzgerald Sr. Network & Security Admin. ITS, Camosun College, Victoria, BC. On 09-11-28 3:09 AM, "Alfred Schweder" wrote: > Hello > > I'd like to seperate the routing instance of fxp0 for

Re: [j-nsp] Trunking routed vlan interfaces on a Juniper mx960

Khambal [mailto:nkham...@juniper.net] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 3:09 PM To: Brian Fitzgerald; Michael Phung Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Trunking routed vlan interfaces on a Juniper mx960 Hi Brian, Your way of configuring trunks and access ports is what I call an old

Re: [j-nsp] Trunking routed vlan interfaces on a Juniper mx960

Hello Michael An alternate is to use the flexible-services that the MX has available - leaves you able to use other vlans on the ports for direct routed use, logical routers, QinQ tagging, VPLS, etc. HSRP is Cisco specific - the equivalent with everyone else is VRRP - which most Cisco gear also s