I banged my head against the wall forever on this. Juniper has no
network statement...
What I have been told is that you essentially have to redistribute
something into BGP to get it in there... The most cisco-like way is to
redistbute a static route of exact prefix length into BGP. That
believe there is also a way to send
inactive routes, but I think that is irrelevant to your question.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question, but in Junos, what is the preferred
method for getting a network into BGP
This may sound like a dumb question, but in Junos, what is the preferred
method for getting a network into BGP? The equivalent of the Cisco
network statement...
All of the examples I can find basically redistribute other routing
protocols into BGP... which for some reason strikes me as
Of course it depends on the ISP. It's all about growing a bush tall and
wide, not too tall, not too wide.
Depends on how much summarization you can do with your address space,
how regionalized their address space is, If they have been lucky enough
to de-aggregate supernets, and keep aside
interface
for the IGP.
This will eliminate the need for next hop self in the first place.
This seems simpler to me, am I missing any reason not to use this?
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 6, 2008, at 12:46 AM, Dan Armstrong wrote:
EUREKA you're a genius
to do decent deterministic traffic engineering toward your
nexthops.
I think the whole notion of my IPs in IGP only is silly..
James
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 9, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A hotly debated topic among BGP nerds I honestly don't know
how I
. This way
you only set nhs to the external bgp routes, not ones learned via iBGP.
i.e.
policy-options {
policy-statement nhs {
from {
protocol bgp;
external;
}
then {
next-hop self;
accept;
}
}
}
cheers
Sean
Dan
:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:08:45PM -0400, Dan Armstrong wrote:
In IOS, if I set next-hop self in a neighbor relationship with an
RR-Client, it sets the next-hop to itself for routes learned from local
eBGP sessions, but leaves the next-hop unchanged for routes that it's
passing on from other
;
}
then {
next-hop self;
accept;
}
}
HTH,
Kevin
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to make a generic policy statement that I could deploy across all
our boxes... this is not possible if we name ebgp peers specifically
I'm new to JunOS, coming from IOS - and I'm having a heck of a time
wrapping my brain around something that should be fairly simple...
eg:
If I am a route-reflector server. I also have eBGP sessions. My ebgp
session's next hop is in 'other people's' address space, so I don't
carry it in
10 matches
Mail list logo
