Re: [j-nsp] MX104 Segregated Process

would disrupt the service as a whole - and additional de-coupling can create new and difficult to troubleshoot de-synchronization bugs between processes. This distinction, thus, may prove less important or beneficial than it first appears. -- Sincerely, David Monosov On 06/07/2020 20:05

Re: [j-nsp] MX5 first supported JunOS

Please excuse the typo, that was meant to be 11.2R3, not 11.4R3; the documentation URL is for the correct version. On 05/25/2014 11:43 PM, David Monosov wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Support for Juniper MX5, MX10, MX20 and MX40 was introduced in 11.4R3; see > http://www.juniper.net/te

Re: [j-nsp] MX5 first supported JunOS

the bump to 12.3R6.6 in March this year. -- Sincerely, David Monosov On 05/25/2014 11:31 PM, Robert Hass wrote: > Hi > We waiting for ordered MX5 routers. Currently we're using MX80 in core > running JunOS 11.4R software. > > My question is which first supported JunOS vers

Re: [j-nsp] MS NLB multicast mode and EX 12.x new behaviour issues

as been a mixed experience. With 12.1, an actual bpdufilter-alike knob was finally introduced - but now multicast MS NLB is broken again... Hoping to see this fixed soon in a meaningful way. -- Respectfully yours, David Monosov On 04/01/2013 11:33 AM, Tarko Tikan wrote: > hey, > > I just w

[j-nsp] JUNOSe multi-topology IS-IS support?

, David Monosov ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp