02:12 a.m.
Para: Paul Stewart
CC: Ger, Javier; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Asunto: Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.0R3 MX960 (DPC's only)
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:13:41PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
And it sounds like you do a mighty fine job finding them ;)
Those items you list wouldn't be effecting us
Dear community,
Could you possibly provide any feedback about JunOS 10.0R3 on MX960
devices (having only DPC's)? Is anyone currently running it and is it
stable? Any serious bugs I should be aware?
I would thanks your comments/opinions.
Javier Ger
Hornos 690 - Buenos Aires -
- Argentina
Tel +54.11.5530.4531
Cel +54.9.11.3926.5017
j...@cablevision.com.ar
www.cablevision.com.ar
-Mensaje original-
De: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net]
Enviado el: Martes, 19 de Octubre de 2010 12:39 p.m.
Para: Ger, Javier; David Lockuan; Cristian Frizziero
CC: juniper-nsp
p.m.
Para: Ger, Javier; David Lockuan; Cristian Frizziero
CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Asunto: RE: [j-nsp] Problem of Forwarding on VPN using vrf-table-label.
If I follow, by learning a route from the ce whether by static, ospf, bgp, etc,
the PE is able to bind that route to the CE next-hop
Dear community,
just to add some additional comments/questions about this topic.
We have 2 PE (logical systems) with 2 VRF belonging to same VPN (working with
AFI IPv4 and SAFI VPNv4).
- VRF-A in PE1 has only 1 CE1 facing interface and a PE-CE eBGP session is
established throught it.
- VRF-A
5 matches
Mail list logo