Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.0R3 MX960 (DPC's only)

2010-11-09 Thread Ger, Javier
02:12 a.m. Para: Paul Stewart CC: Ger, Javier; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Asunto: Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.0R3 MX960 (DPC's only) On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:13:41PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: And it sounds like you do a mighty fine job finding them ;) Those items you list wouldn't be effecting us

[j-nsp] JunOS 10.0R3 MX960 (DPC's only)

2010-10-31 Thread Ger, Javier
Dear community, Could you possibly provide any feedback about JunOS 10.0R3 on MX960 devices (having only DPC's)? Is anyone currently running it and is it stable? Any serious bugs I should be aware? I would thanks your comments/opinions. Javier Ger Hornos 690 - Buenos Aires -

Re: [j-nsp] Problem of Forwarding on VPN using vrf-table-label.

2010-10-20 Thread Ger, Javier
- Argentina Tel +54.11.5530.4531 Cel +54.9.11.3926.5017 j...@cablevision.com.ar www.cablevision.com.ar -Mensaje original- De: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net] Enviado el: Martes, 19 de Octubre de 2010 12:39 p.m. Para: Ger, Javier; David Lockuan; Cristian Frizziero CC: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Problem of Forwarding on VPN using vrf-table-label.

2010-10-20 Thread Ger, Javier
p.m. Para: Ger, Javier; David Lockuan; Cristian Frizziero CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Asunto: RE: [j-nsp] Problem of Forwarding on VPN using vrf-table-label. If I follow, by learning a route from the ce whether by static, ospf, bgp, etc, the PE is able to bind that route to the CE next-hop

Re: [j-nsp] Problem of Forwarding on VPN using vrf-table-label.

2010-10-19 Thread Ger, Javier
Dear community, just to add some additional comments/questions about this topic. We have 2 PE (logical systems) with 2 VRF belonging to same VPN (working with AFI IPv4 and SAFI VPNv4). - VRF-A in PE1 has only 1 CE1 facing interface and a PE-CE eBGP session is established throught it. - VRF-A