Re: [j-nsp] Any interest in my script that auto generate nagios configs for juniper devices polled via SNMP?

Hi Morgan, Very much interested in such a tool, already have several deployments of nagios in different environments. Thanks, Ido -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morgan McLean Sent: Friday, July 20,

Re: [j-nsp] route BGP stall bug

Hi Tim, Do you happen to have port mirroring/sampling enabled on the router? We encountered a similar issue, JTAC found out that sampled process was causing this behavior and it is solved in 11.4R4 (we did not upgrade yet to test in our environment and it also doesn't appear in the release notes

Re: [j-nsp] snmp { filter-interfaces {}}; wildcard usage

Or even better yet, [g|x|a]e.*\.32767 :) -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Kawchuk Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:46 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] snmp { filter-interfaces

Re: [j-nsp] snmp { filter-interfaces {}}; wildcard usage

Filter ge.*\.32767 -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Kawchuk Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:46 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] snmp { filter-interfaces {}}; wildcard usage

Re: [j-nsp] next hop behavior within between VRFs

Hi Stacy, Our topology is LNS --- MX vrf A --- logical tunnel --- MX vrf B --- logical tunnel --- MX inet.0 What we're trying to accomplish is pretty simple, due to special needs of our customer most traffic should be forwarded to servers in vrf B, In order to do that we advertise a default

Re: [j-nsp] next hop behavior within between VRFs

Yes, connectivity across the lt (pings from one side to the other) is working, Ido -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of OBrien, Will Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 3:11 AM To: Amos Rosenboim Cc:

[j-nsp] Graphs for IPv6 traffic

Hi All, I am looking for a way to poll snmp data on IPv6 traffic (bps, pps) on MX80 to a cacti graph, does anyone have any luck with doing that? Thanks, Ido. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

Hi Keegan, What is most likely to happen is that the session established since those are small packets, then the routers try to send the route messages which are large in case you are sharing full routing table, those messages do not arrive to the other side because of the MTU mismatch, thus

[j-nsp] High CPU on E120

Hi All, We have an issue with E120 (luckily , not yet in production), running 12.1.0, the router is constantly on 100% CPU. We can see that there are several httpc process running that consumes the CPU, even though the http server is not enabled on the box. Killing those processes helps for

Re: [j-nsp] Yellow led and Red led alarms in Juniper

Hi Martin, You have the set chassis alarams stanza where you can play with the chassis alarms levels (yellow/red/ignore) The most useful thing I use is to turn off the red alarm about the MGMT interface not connected to anything on EX switches. Regards, Ido. -Original Message- From:

[j-nsp] fpc fails to load after an upgrade of MX

Hi All, We have MX960 router which we upgraded from 10.2R3 to 10.4R2, we are encountering problems with one of our FPCs The FPC is MX FPC Type 2 with 4x STM-4-1 SFP PIC and 1 SFP installed. We upgraded one of our REs and had some issues in bringing the FPC online, several times it said

Re: [j-nsp] ERX310 disconnects and radius wrong source address

Hi Tom, When the ERX boots up its normal that the SRP will finish booting before all the line cards will, Since you only have 1 line card, how are subscribers able to connect before it finished booting? Of course if your radius source address is on the line card that is still down, it won't

[j-nsp] rollback of commit confirmed not working on MX routers with 10.2R3.10

Hi All, On both our MX960 routers I encountered a problem where rollback of commit confirmed doesn't work, When it is due to rollback the configuration the mgd process crashes and a core dump is created, then it starts counting backwards. (-1 minute etc) If I then try to commit again I

Re: [j-nsp] RE : SNMP if-mib stops responding

Hi, Thanks for the info, restarting the PFED did solve our issue. Regards, Ido. -Original Message- From: Tarique A. Nalkhande - BMC [mailto:t.nalkhande@mobily.com.sa] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 10:51 PM To: david@orange-ftgroup.com; Pekka Savola; Ido Szargel Cc: juniper

[j-nsp] Matching multiple communities in a policy-statement

Hi all, I am trying to find a way to match 2 communities on a policy-statement (both of them must exist), any ideas on how to achieve that? I couldn't find any community-list or such configuration available, we are using MX routers. Thanks, Ido. ___

Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 series and q-in-q (802.1ad)

Hi Stephane, Best place to check is juniper website http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/topics/concept/ex-series-software-features-overview.html There are many features not (yet) supported in EX2200 Regards, Ido. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net