Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

2023-12-13 Thread Jackson, William via juniper-nsp
the default gateway’s mac address. If that is still occurring, then it would seem that proxy arp functionality is still working and you can move on to tshooting something beyond that… like what is the upstream def gw/evpn pe doing with those packets Aaron > On Dec 6, 2023, at 6:16 AM, Jacks

[j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

2023-12-06 Thread Jackson, William via juniper-nsp
Hi Maybe somebody knows the answer to this one: We migrated some customers to an EVPN domain away from a legacy node that used proxy-arp on its L3 interface. The downstream clients have some funky routing and they are relying on proxy-arp to resolve an offnet address (don't ask me why for our

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 Port Layout

2023-06-26 Thread Jackson, William via juniper-nsp
>The MX204 is an MPC7E, so whatever H-QoS is on the MPC7E is what the >MX204 will also do. >We have used them as an edge router on a temporary basis at new sites, >with an Arista switch hanging off of them via an 802.1Q trunk, until we >can get our standard MX480 to site. They are capable for

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan 111 on EVPN-VXLAN

2022-04-05 Thread Jackson, William via juniper-nsp
We ran into a limitation on qfx5100 where you could not define more than "8?" conditions Ie: Vlan members [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] would fail But Vlan members [ 1-9 10 20-25 ] would work Chipset limitation if I recall. Best to open a JTAC case -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp