ot;
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] B-RAS services
On 9/May/16 21:03, Jason Warren via juniper-nsp wrote:
> Honestly 10G interfaces is not needed now nor anytime soon but would be nice
> to have the option down the road. The current router is acting as B-R
w, transmission,
dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the material from any computer, including any copies.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jason Warren via juniper-nsp
wrote:
I have a Cisco 7206VXR that I am wanting to replace with a Juniper MX80
(purchased as an MX5) or similar. The main core function is just Ethernet
routing... but it also is acting as a B-RAS router for about 400 PPPoE
sessions. I know the license cost on the MX80 for subscriber services is close
3 matches
Mail list logo
